Latin words first recorded in the 2nd century

It is from Latin resurgō (“to rise again”) + -tiō, formed on the stem of its past participle. The verb is formed from re- (“again”) and surgō (“to rise”), which de Vaan lists among the derivatives…

It is from Latin retribuō (“to give back, repay”) + -tiō.

It is from Latin revēlō (“to unveil, uncover, reveal”) + -tiō. The verb is formed from re- (“back”) and vēlō (“to cover, veil”), from vēlum (“veil”). The bilingual glossaries give Greek ἀποκάλυψις…

It is an agent noun from Latin revēlō (“to uncover, reveal”), formed with the suffix -tor. Conte counts it among the Late Latin words, the source of Italian rivelatore.

It is the neuter singular of the adjective salūtāris (“healthful, saving”), used as a noun, which is from Latin salūs + -āris.

It is from Latin sānctus (“holy”) + faciō (“to make”), a Christian formation. Georges and Gaffiot derive it from the adjective sānctificus (“making holy”).

It is from Latin sapor (“taste, flavour”), with the verbal ending -ō.

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek Σατάν (Satán), from Biblical Hebrew שָׂטָן (Śāṭān, “adversary, accuser”). The Hebrew noun comes from a verb meaning “to show enmity to, oppose”. Latin also has the…

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek σκάνδαλον (skándalon, “trap; cause of moral stumbling”). Etymonline notes that the Greek noun in this form is first found in the Septuagint and the New Testament…

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek σχίσμα (skhísma, “split, schism”), a noun from σχίζω (skhízō, “to split”). Isidore explained it as named from a split of minds.

It is formed from Latin sēgregō + -tiō, from the verb meaning “to separate”.

It is formed from Latin sēnsus (“sense, feeling”) + -ālis, from sentiō (“to perceive, feel”).

It is from Latin singulāris (“single, alone”) + -tās, a post-Classical abstract noun.

It is from Latin speciālis (“particular, special”) + -tās. Köbler traces it further to speciēs (“appearance, kind”).

It is from Latin stēlla (“star”) + -āris. It is a Late Latin word. Its base stēlla goes back to Proto-Italic *stērlā- and Proto-Indo-European *h₂stēr-s (“star”); de Vaan takes it, with Old Irish…

It is from Latin substantia (“substance, essence”) + -ālis. The English word substantial comes from it, partly through Old French substantiel.

It is from Latin substantia (“substance, being”).

It is from Latin sufferēns + -ia, from the present participle of sufferō (“to bear, endure”).

It is formed from Latin superficiēs (“top, surface”) + -ālis. Etymonline analyses superficiēs as super “above” and faciēs “form, face”.

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek τελώνιον (telṓnion, “toll house”), from τελώνης (telṓnēs) with the suffix -ιον (-ion). The variant telōnēum follows τελωνεῖον (telōneîon).

It is from Latin testimōnium + -ālis, an adjective on the noun for testimony.

It is from Latin trīnus + -tās, formed from the distributive numeral trīnī (“three each, three”). This goes back to the numeral trēs “three”, and de Vaan lists it among the derivatives of trēs…

It is from Latin turbulentus (“disturbed, stormy”). Its base is turba (“commotion, crowd”), whose further origin de Vaan finds very uncertain.

It is formed from Latin ūniformis (“having one form”) + -tās. The DMLBS and Conte call it Late Latin. The base is a compound of ūnus (“one”) and fōrma (“form”).

It is from Latin vīsibilis + -tās, from videō (“to see”).

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek ζηλωτής (zēlōtḗs, “zealous follower, emulator”), from ζηλόω (zēlóō, “to be zealous, emulate”), from ζῆλος (zêlos, “zeal, jealousy”).

It is from Latin arcus (“bow”) + -ārius.

It is probably a denominative verb in -ō from a lost adjective, inherited from Proto-Italic *aisos-ko- (“demanding”), which goes back to Proto-Indo-European *h₂eis-os- (“request”). The Umbrian verb…

It is formed from Latin arbitror (“to judge, think”) + -tiō.

It is from Latin causor (“to plead as an excuse”) + -tiō, a noun of action from the verb, itself from causa (“cause”). The TLL also records the spelling ⟨caussatio⟩.

It is from Latin competēns + -ia, the present participle of competō (“to coincide; to be suitable”) being the base. The OLD models it on competenter with the suffix -ia.

It is formed from Latin con- + cēlō (“to hide”), with the prefix strengthening the verb: “to hide thoroughly”.

It is from Latin con- + tempus (“time”) + -āneus. Etymonline sees in its form the influence of Late Latin temporāneus (“timely”). The noun goes back to Proto-Italic *tempos- (“stretch, measure”) and…

It is the neuter plural of the past participle from Latin dīgerō (“to distribute, arrange”), used as a noun: “things arranged”. The name refers to works divided into books and chapters.

It is from Latin dissertō (“to discuss, argue”) with the suffix -tiō, although the OLD derives it directly from disserō (“to set out in words, discuss”). De Vaan lists disserō among the compounds of…

It is from Latin dubius (“doubtful”) + -ōsus. The TLL derives it from the noun dubium (“doubt”).

It is from Latin ex- + vapōrō (“to steam”), the verb of vapor (“steam, vapour”).

It is formed from Latin fingō (“to form, fashion”) + -mentum. De Vaan traces the verb to a nasal present Proto-Indo-European *dʰi-n-ǵʰ-.

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek γλωσσάριον (glōssárion), a diminutive of γλῶσσα (glôssa, “tongue; obsolete or foreign word”). Wiktionary instead analyses it as from Latin glōssa + -ārium, a…

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek ἑβδομάς (hebdomás, “the number seven; a week”), itself from ἑπτά (heptá, “seven”). Lewis & Short, Georges and Gaffiot treat it as a by-form of hebdomas, and the TLL…

It is formed from Latin in- + peccō (“to make a mistake, sin”) + -bilis.

It is from Latin in- (“not”) + dēfīnītus (“definite”).

It is from Latin indifferēns (“not differing”) + -ia.

It is from Latin in- (“not”) + sēnsibilis (“perceptible”). That adjective comes from sentiō (“to perceive, feel”).

It is from Latin memoriālis (“of memory”), its neuter used as a noun. The adjective is formed from memoria (“memory”), itself from memor (“mindful”).

It is formed from Latin ōmen + -ōsus, “full of omens”.

1. The adjective of the ovation is from Latin ovō (“to celebrate an ovation, rejoice”) + -ālis. 2. The egg adjective is from Latin ōvum (“egg”) + -ālis.

It is from Latin praeparō (“to prepare beforehand”), with the suffix -tus of action nouns. That verb is a compound of prae- and parō (“to furnish, provide”), which de Vaan traces to Proto-Italic…

It is from Latin praestīgiae (“tricks, illusions”) + -ōsus. The TLL derives it from the older form ⟨praestrigiae⟩, though the manuscripts have only ⟨-stig-⟩.

It is formed from Latin prōverbium (“proverb”) + -ālis.

It is a verb from Latin recēns (“fresh, new”), meaning “to make fresh”. Gaffiot, Jeanneau and VoLat do not treat it as a word of its own and refer it to recantō. It has descendants in Romance, which…

It is formed from Latin re- + tāliō (“punishment in kind”) as a verb of the first conjugation. Etymonline takes tāliō itself to be from, or influenced by, tālis (“such”).

It is from Latin rumpō (“to break, burst”) + -ūra.

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek θεώρημα (theṓrēma, “spectacle; proposition to be proved”), from θεωρέω (theōréō, “to look at, behold”).

It is formed from Latin vocō (“to call”) + -īvus. Wiktionary takes it as a calque of Ancient Greek κλητική (klētikḗ).

It is probably from Latin bāris (“flat-bottomed Nile boat”). Wiktionary explains it as a syncopated form of Vulgar Latin *bārica. Latin ⟨bāris⟩ is from Ancient Greek βᾶρις (bâris), which goes back…

It is from Latin serpēns (“serpent, snake”) + -īnus, an adjective of Christian Latin; serpēns is itself the present participle of serpō (“to creep, crawl”).

It is from Latin candēla (“candle”) + -ārius.

It is from Latin abūtor (“to use up; to misuse”) + -īvus, formed on the participle stem ⟨abūs-⟩ of the verb.

It is from Latin animōsus (“spirited, bold”) + -tās. The adjective comes from animus (“mind, spirit”), which de Vaan traces back to Proto-Italic *anamo- (“breath, spirit”) and Proto-Indo-European…