Etymologically

300–201 BC

Latin words first recorded in the 3rd century BC

3,384 Latin words whose earliest known written record dates from the 3rd century BC, earliest first (page 13). Words dated only to part of the century follow the ones with a year.

  1. drachma

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is borrowed from Ancient Greek δραχμή (drakhmḗ, “drachma”); Wiktionary takes it from the Doric form δραχμά (drakhmá). Köbler and Etymonline explain the Greek word as originally “a handful”, a…

  2. ducto

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin dūcō (“to lead”) + -tō, a frequentative. De Vaan derives all the forms in ⟨duct-⟩ from the participle ⟨ductus⟩, and traces dūcō to Proto-Italic *douk-e- and Proto-Indo-European…

  3. ductus

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin dūcō (“to lead, draw”) + -tus, a fourth-declension action noun. De Vaan traces dūcō to Proto-Italic *douk-e- and Proto-Indo-European *deuk-e/o- (“to draw”). Cognate with Middle…

  4. dudum

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is formed from a root ⟨dū-⟩ “long (time)”, which also gives dūrus (“hard, lasting”), and the enclitic, from Latin -dum. De Vaan traces the root to Proto-Indo-European *dweh₂- (“far, long”)…

  5. dummodo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin dum (“while, as long as”) + modo (“only”). The adverb modo is a derivative of modus (“measure”), which de Vaan traces to Proto-Italic *medo- (“measure, judgement”) and…

  6. dumtaxat

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is formed from Latin dum (“while, as long as”) + taxat, probably a subjunctive of an old verb ⟨*taxō⟩ from tangō (“to touch”), like vīsō (“to visit”) beside ⟨videō⟩; so roughly “as far as it…

  7. duodeviginti

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is a compound from Latin duo (“two”) + dē (“from”) + vīgintī (“twenty”), that is, “two from twenty”. Paulus' epitome of Festus says that the Romans took this way of counting from the Greeks. The…

  8. dupliciter

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin duplex + -ter, the adverb of duplex (“double”). De Vaan takes duplex as the model of the compounds in -plex, with ⟨du-⟩ from duo (“two”), and traces it to Proto-Indo-European…

  9. duplico

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin duplex (“double, twofold”) + -ō. De Vaan notes that duplex is one of the compounds in which Latin replaced the old prefix *dwi- with du-, from duo (“two”), which he traces to…

  10. duritia

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin dūrus (“hard”) + -itia. De Vaan traces dūrus to Proto-Italic *dūro- and Proto-Indo-European *du(e)h₂-ro- (“far, long”), comparing Ancient Greek δηρός (dērós, “long”); Etymonline…

  11. -e

    250 BC–184 BC

    The suffix is inherited from Proto-Italic *-ēd, Old Latin ⟨-ēd⟩, seen in ⟨facilumed⟩ and ⟨rected⟩, and shared with Sabellic: Oscan amprufid answers to improbē and Umbrian rehte to rēctē. Wiktionary…

  12. e

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is the form of ex “out of” used before consonants. De Vaan explains ⟨ē-⟩ from ⟨*egz-⟩, the variant of ⟨*eks⟩ before voiced consonants (⟨b d g l m n r⟩ and consonantal ⟨i u⟩). The preposition is…

  13. ebibo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + bibō (“to drink”). De Vaan traces bibō to Proto-Italic *pibe/o- and the reduplicated present Proto-Indo-European *pi-ph₃-e/o- (“to drink”), and dates the compound from Plautus.

  14. ebur

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is a foreign word, probably borrowed from Egyptian ꜣbw (“elephant, ivory”), perhaps through a Demotic form. The TLL also compares the Coptic word for “elephant”, and Lewis and Short connect…

  15. eburnus

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ebur (“ivory”) + -nus. For ebur the OLD compares Egyptian ꜣbw (“elephant, ivory”), and Wiktionary takes it as a loanword, probably through Demotic, from that Egyptian word, perhaps…

  16. ecastor

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is a compound from Latin ē + Castor, the interjection and the name, “by Castor”, made like edepol “by Pollux”.

  17. ecce

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is probably formed from Latin ec- + -ce, the deictic particle also found in hic. De Vaan reconstructs Proto-Italic *ek + Proto-Italic *ke: the pronoun Proto-Indo-European *h₁e- (“he”) of is…

  18. eccum

    250 BC–184 BC

    The OLD explains it as from Latin ecce (“behold”) + *hum, the second part probably an old accusative, that is hunc (“this one”). Walde and Hofmann likewise derive the forms from ecce with forms of…

  19. echinus

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is borrowed from Ancient Greek ἐχῖνος (ekhînos, “hedgehog, sea urchin”). Köbler connects the Greek word with the Indo-European word for “snake”, as a name of the snake-eater.

  20. ecquis

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ec- + quis (“who?”). De Vaan explains the particle ⟨ec-⟩, as in ecce (“look!”), from Proto-Indo-European *h₁e- (“he”) extended with ⟨*k⟩, as in Oscan ekúk (“this”). The TLL reports…

  21. edax

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin edō (“to eat”) + -āx. De Vaan traces edō to Proto-Italic *ed- (“to eat”) and Proto-Indo-European *h₁ed- (“to eat”), comparing Oscan edum (“to eat”), Sanskrit अद्मि (ádmi, “I eat”)…

  22. edepol

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is made from Latin ē, the interjection (as in ēcastor (“by Castor!”)), a shortened ⟨de⟩ that is probably the vocative ⟨deive⟩ of dīvus (“god”), and pol, the shortened vocative of Pollūx…

  23. edisco

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- (“thoroughly”) + discō (“to learn”). De Vaan traces discō to Proto-Italic *dikske/o- and Proto-Indo-European *di-dḱ-sḱ-e/o- (“to take, accept”), a reduplicated present with an…

  24. edissero

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + disserō (“to set out in words, discuss”). The simple verb is formed with dis- from serō (“to join, link”), which goes back to Proto-Indo-European *ser-e/o- (“to thread, tie…

  25. edoceo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + doceō (“to teach”). The verb doceō goes back to Proto-Italic *dok-eje- and Proto-Indo-European *doḱ-eie- (“to make someone accept something”). Cognate with Hittite dākki…

  26. efflo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + flō (“to blow, breathe”). De Vaan tentatively traces flō to Proto-Indo-European *bʰleh₁- (“to blow”), and thinks it may be related to fleō (“to weep”).

  27. effodio

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + fodiō (“to dig”). The verb fodiō goes back to Proto-Italic *foþ-i- and Proto-Indo-European *bʰodʰ-i- (“to poke, dig”). Cognate with Hittite padda- (“to dig”) and Lithuanian…

  28. effringo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + frangō (“to break”). De Vaan traces frangō to Proto-Italic *frang- and the nasal present Proto-Indo-European *bʰr-n-ǵ- (“to break”), comparing Old High German brehhan (“to…

  29. effundo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is formed from Latin ex- (“out”) + fundō (“to pour”). De Vaan derives fundō from Proto-Italic *χund-e/o-, from Proto-Indo-European *ǵʰu-n-d- (“to pour”), a nasal present of the root of Ancient…

  30. egens

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin egeō (“to lack, need”), its present participle, used as an adjective. De Vaan traces ⟨egeō⟩ to Proto-Italic *egē- (“to lack”), beside an s-stem noun Proto-Indo-European *h₁eǵ-es-…

  31. ehem

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is an interjection that the OLD and the TLL compare with hem. Köbler, after Pokorny, groups it with eheu and eho under a reconstructed interjection Proto-Indo-European *ehem.

  32. eheu

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is an expressive cry, related to heu (“alas”). Wiktionary compares Sanskrit अहो (aho), a comparison that once led scholars to assume an Indo-European origin. Köbler refers it to Pokorny's…

  33. eho

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is an interjection, for which the OLD and Lewis & Short give no etymology. Köbler groups it with the interjection Proto-Indo-European *ē.

  34. ei

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is an exclamation of grief, which the OLD compares with Ancient Greek αἴ (aí, “ah!”). Köbler sets it beside a reconstructed interjection Proto-Indo-European *ēi (Pokorny 297).

  35. eiulo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is formed from Latin ei “ah!”, the interjection, with the suffix shaped after iūbilō (“to shout for joy”). Lewis & Short derive it from the exclamations hei and heu, and the grammarian…

  36. eiuro

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + iūrō (“to swear”). The TLL leaves open whether the variant ⟨ēierō⟩ is the same word or related to it by vowel alternation, as with dēierō and pēierō. De Vaan derives iūrō from…

  37. elabor

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is formed from Latin ex- (“out”) + lābor (“to slip, glide”). De Vaan doubts the usual link of ⟨lābor⟩ with labō (“to totter”), since the vowel alternation is hard to explain, and leaves ⟨lābor⟩…

  38. elegans

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin *ēlegāre (“to choose carefully”), the participle of this unattested verb, related to ēligō (“to pick out, choose”). Wiktionary derives that verb from an intermediate noun *ēlegus…

  39. elegantia

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ēlegāns (“tasteful, refined”) + -ia. De Vaan explains ēlegāns from a verb *ex-legāre, alone among the compounds of legō (“to collect, choose”) in having that form, and traces legō…

  40. elixus

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + *lixus (“fluid, flowing”), built like prōlixus; its first meaning must have been “boiling out”. The simple adjective is unattested, but its feminine survives as the noun lixa…

  41. elleborus

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is borrowed from Ancient Greek ἑλλέβορος (helléboros, “hellebore”). Köbler, following Frisk, connects its first part with Ancient Greek ἐλλός (ellós, “young deer”). The native Latin name of the…

  42. elogium

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is apparently borrowed from Ancient Greek ἐλεγεῖον (elegeîon, “elegiac distich, verse inscription”), reshaped under the influence of λόγος (lógos, “word”) or of ēloquium, or reanalysed as ē-…

  43. eloquor

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is formed from Latin ex- (“out”) + loquor (“to speak”). De Vaan traces ⟨loquor⟩ to Proto-Italic *(t)lokʷe- and Proto-Indo-European *tlokʷ- (“to talk”), cognate with Old Irish ad·tluchedar (“gives…

  44. eludo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is formed from Latin ex- (“out”) + lūdō (“to play”). De Vaan derives ⟨lūdō⟩ from Proto-Italic *loid-e/o- (“to play”) and Proto-Indo-European *loid- (“to let go often, play”), cognate with Ancient…

  45. em

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is probably a shortened imperative from Latin emō (“to take”), originally “take!”. De Vaan derives the imperative ⟨*eme⟩ from Proto-Indo-European *h₁em-e/o- (“to take”), cognate with Umbrian…

  46. ementior

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + mentior (“to lie”). De Vaan explains mentior as a verb made from Proto-Italic *mn̥ti-, the noun that became mēns (“mind”), from Proto-Indo-European *mn-ti- (“thought, mind”)…

  47. emereo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + mereō (“to earn, serve”). De Vaan traces mereō to Proto-Italic *mer-ē- (“to earn”) and, with a question mark, Proto-Indo-European *(s)mr-eh₁- (“to earn”), and finds its…

  48. emeritus

    250 BC–184 BC

    Used as an adjective, it is the perfect participle from Latin ēmereō (“to serve out, earn”), also of the deponent ēmereor. The verb is from Latin ex- + mereō (“to earn”), and de Vaan records it from…

  49. emico

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- (“out”) + micō (“to dart, flash”). De Vaan traces micō to Proto-Italic *mikaje- and Proto-Indo-European *mikH-(e)ie- (“to blink”): the basic Latin meaning is to dart or move…

  50. emolumentum

    250 BC–184 BC

    The OLD derives it from Latin ēmolō (“to grind out”) + -mentum, originally probably “the output of a mill”; the TLL, following Walde, explains it as what the miller gets by grinding, and Döderlein…

  51. emorior

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + morior (“to die”). De Vaan traces morior to Proto-Italic *morje- (“to die”) and Proto-Indo-European *mr-ie/o- (“to die”), comparing Sanskrit म्रियते (mriyáte, “to die”)…

  52. emptor

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is formed from Latin emō (“to buy”) + -tor. De Vaan derives ⟨emō⟩ from Proto-Italic *eme/o- (“to take”) and Proto-Indo-European *h₁em-e/o- (“to take”), so that buying was first taking. Cognate…

  53. emungo

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + *mungō, a compound of a simple verb that is not attested on its own. De Vaan traces the stem to Proto-Italic *mung- (“to wipe”) and Proto-Indo-European *(s)mu-n-k- (“to brush…

  54. en

    250 BC–184 BC

    The origin is uncertain. De Vaan holds that at least part of the Latin uses, especially from Virgil on, are the identical interjection Ancient Greek ἤν (ḗn, “look!”), which the OLD also gives. For…

  55. enarro

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + narrō (“to tell”). De Vaan lists it, with the simple verb, among the derivatives of gnārus (“knowing”); the simple verb lost the ⟨g-⟩ that the adjective kept on the model of…

  56. eneco

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- (“out, completely”) + necō (“to kill”). De Vaan lists it, beside the simple verb, among the derivatives of nex (“death, violent death”), which goes back to Proto-Italic *nek-…

  57. enimvero

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin enim (“indeed”) + vērō (“truly”). De Vaan traces enim to Proto-Italic *enim, an accusative of the pronoun Proto-Italic *eno- (“that one”), and Proto-Indo-European *h₁e-no-…

  58. enitor

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- (“out”) + nītor (“to lean, strive”). De Vaan lists it among the derivatives of nītor, which he reconstructs as Proto-Italic *kniχw-et- and connects with cōnīveō (“to be tightly…

  59. enixe

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ēnīxus (“strenuous”) with the adverb ending -ē. That adjective is the participle of ēnītor (“to struggle, strive”), a compound of ex- and nītor (“to lean, strive”), which de Vaan…

  60. eno

    250 BC–184 BC

    It is from Latin ex- + nō (“to swim”). De Vaan traces nō to Proto-Italic *(s)nāje/o- (“to swim”) and Proto-Indo-European *(s)neh₂- (“to swim, float”). Cognate with Old Irish snaïd (“to swim”) and…

All Latin words by century →