Etymologically

correspond

Etymology and origin of the English word correspond

Confidence
Established
Formation
Borrowing
First attested
1529 letter of King Henry VIII
Borrowed from
Latin correspondeo
Ultimate origin
Latin respondeō
Etymology tree
inherited borrowed derived
Latin spondeo
Latin respondeo
Italian rispondere
English correspond
From the same root
Latin conspondeo ← spondeo
Latin sponsio ← spondeo
Latin sponsor ← spondeo
Latin sponsus ← spondeo
Latin responsivus ← respondeo
Latin responso ← respondeo
Latin responsus ← respondeo
Latin correspondentia ← correspondeo

Pronunciation

  • UK: /ˌkɒɹɪˈspɒnd/, /ˌkɒɹəˈspɒnd/[1]
  • US: /ˌkoɹəˈspɑnd/[1]

Etymology

It is borrowed from Medieval Latin correspondeō (“to correspond, harmonize, reciprocate”),[2][3][4][5] partly borrowed from Middle French correspondre (“to be in harmony, agree”), recorded in French from the 14th century.[3][4][6][7] The Latin verb is formed from com- (“together, with each other”), in its form cor-, and respondeō (“to answer”), the source of respond.[2][3][8][9] The OED notes that the word was formed to express a mutual answering of things to each other, and that before it reached English it could already describe one side of such a relation only.[2] Etymonline likewise says that in Medieval Latin it was first used of two things acting on each other, and later of one thing.[3]

Earliest recorded meaning

To agree with, suit, be in harmony with: 1529, in a letter of King Henry VIII.[2][5][4] The Shorter Oxford and the Oxford Dictionary of English date the verb to late Middle English.[6][10]

Semantic evolution

From agreement the verb moved to likeness: "to be similar or analogous to" is recorded from 1645,[2][3] and "to agree in position or amount" from 1694.[2] A sense "to hold communication with", often of secret dealings, appears about 1600,[3][2] and narrowed by 1650 to communicating by exchange of letters, a sense shared by correspondence and correspondent;[2][4][11] Barnhart dates the letter-writing sense to 1645.[4] The OED observes that this sense keeps the mutual idea of the Latin.[2] Further uses of commercial dealings (1682) and, once in 1756, of sexual relations have died out.[2][3] Johnson (1755) gave two senses, to suit or fit and to keep up an exchange of letters.[12] Weekley notes that the journalistic sense of correspondent grew up with periodical literature from about 1700.[13] In Norfolk dialect correspond could mean to be suitable or becoming.[14]

Timeline

  • 1529 – to agree with, suit, be in harmony with.[2][5]
  • 1545 – transitive, to answer to or suit (obsolete by 1675).[2]
  • c. 1600 – to hold communication with.[3][2]
  • 1645 – to be similar or analogous to; to communicate by letters (Barnhart).[2][3][4]
  • 1650 – to communicate by an exchange of letters (OED).[2]
  • 1694 – to agree in position or amount.[2]

Meanings

Verb

  1. To be in agreement or harmony; to match or be consistent: His account of the evening does not correspond with hers.[15][5][2]
  2. To be similar or analogous in character or function; to be equivalent: The wings of a bat correspond to the arms of a person.[15][5][2]
  3. To agree in position or amount: Each number corresponds to a seat in the hall.[2][5]
  4. To communicate by letters; to exchange letters: The two scientists corresponded for twenty years.[15][5][2][12]

Word family

Usage notes

Dictionary.com distinguishes it from agree and accord: correspond suggests a clear similarity without agreement in every detail, agree that there is no essential difference, and accord an exact agreement.[16]

References

  1. ^ a b Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  4. ^ a b c d e f Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
  5. ^ a b c d e f g Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  6. ^ a b Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  7. ^ Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
  8. ^ The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  9. ^ Skeat, Walter W. (1911), A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, new ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press
  10. ^ Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
  11. ^ Hoad, T. F., ed. (1986), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  12. ^ a b Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
  13. ^ Weekley, Ernest (1921), An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, London: John Murray
  14. ^ Wright, Joseph, ed. (1898–1905), The English Dialect Dictionary, 6 vols., Oxford: Henry Frowde; via EDD Online 4.0, University of Innsbruck (CC BY 4.0)
  15. ^ a b c Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins
  16. ^ Dictionary.com Unabridged (2016), based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, New York: Random House

Related etymologies

Cite this entry

“Correspond.” Etymologically, 31 Oct. 2026, etymologically.com/en/correspond. Accessed 31 Oct. 2026.

Last edited on . ·