Etymologically

Etymology and origin of the English word comprise

Confidence
Established
Formation
Borrowing
First attested
1423 The Kingis Quair
Borrowed from
Old French compris via Middle English
Ultimate origin
Latin comprehendō

Pronunciation

  • /kəmˈpɹaɪz/[1]

Etymology

It is inherited from Middle English comprisen,[2][3] borrowed from Old French compris, the past participle of comprendre (“to contain, include, comprehend”),[4][5][6][7] from Latin comprehendō (“to seize; to include; to understand”), also contracted to comprendō,[8][4][6] the source of comprehend.[6][4] The Latin verb is formed from com- (“with, together; completely”) and prehendō (“to catch hold of, seize”), which contains Proto-Indo-European *ghend- (“to seize, take”).[4] The OED and Hoad explain the English verb in “-prise” by analogy with emprise, enterprise and surprise, which also represent compounds of prendre,[8][9][5] and Weekley notes that adopting a French past participle as an English verb is a common process.[10] In Anglo-Norman the verb meant to include, contain, span, seize and understand from the early 12th century.[11]

Earliest recorded meaning

To lay hold of, take or seize: 1423, in The Kingis Quair, a sense obsolete by 1592.[8][12] Barnhart dates the verb to about 1425, developed from comprised, included.[5]

Semantic evolution

The Latin and French verb meant both "seize" and "understand", and English took over both: to lay hold of (1423) and to take in mentally, comprehend (1477), senses that died out in the 17th century.[8][12] The lasting senses were "to bring together and include, especially in a treatise" (about 1425), "to sum up" (before 1533), and of material things "to contain as parts making up the whole, to consist of" (1481).[8][4] Johnson (1755) defined it as "to contain; to comprehend; to include".[13] From the late 18th century (1794 in Etymonline) it was also used the other way round, of the parts that make up the whole,[4][3] and since the late 19th century in the passive be comprised of, "consist of".[3]

Timeline

  • 1423 – to lay hold of, seize (obsolete by 1592).[8]
  • c. 1425 – to bring together and include, especially in a written work.[8][5]
  • 1477 – to take in mentally, comprehend (obsolete by 1680).[8]
  • 1481 – to contain as parts making up the whole, to consist of.[8][4]
  • 1575 – in Scotland, to seize under legal authority (obsolete).[8]
  • 1794 – to constitute, make up.[4][3]
  • late 19th century – passive be comprised of, to consist of.[3]

Meanings

Verb

  1. To consist of; to be made up of: The committee comprises nine members.[14][3][8]
  2. To include or contain, especially within a particular scope: The course comprises lectures and fieldwork.[14][2]
  3. To make up or constitute the whole of: Women comprise most of the staff.[14][3]
  4. (obsolete) To lay hold of; to seize.[8][2]
  5. (obsolete) To understand or comprehend.[8][2]

Word family

  • comprisable
  • comprisal

Usage notes

The traditional rule is that the whole comprises the parts and the parts compose the whole, so that comprise should not be used for "make up"; the American Heritage Dictionary notes that this distinction is still kept by many writers, while the other use is increasingly common.[15] Dictionary.com notes that both "constitute" and the passive be comprised of are often criticized but appear more and more even in formal writing.[3] Collins advises against comprise of.[14]

References

  1. ^ Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Dictionary.com Unabridged (2016), based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, New York: Random House
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  5. ^ a b c d Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
  6. ^ a b c The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  7. ^ Skeat, Walter W. (1911), A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, new ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  9. ^ Hoad, T. F., ed. (1986), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  10. ^ Weekley, Ernest (1921), An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, London: John Murray
  11. ^ Anglo-Norman Dictionary (AND2), Aberystwyth University, anglo-norman.net (2nd ed., 2005–)
  12. ^ a b Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  13. ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
  14. ^ a b c d Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins
  15. ^ The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (1992), 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Related etymologies

Cite this entry

“Comprise.” Etymologically, 26 Oct. 2026, etymologically.com/en/comprise. Accessed 27 Oct. 2026.

Last edited on . ·