300–201 BC
Latin words first recorded in the 3rd century BC
5,328 Latin words whose earliest known written record dates from the 3rd century BC, earliest first (page 69). Words dated only to part of the century follow the ones with a year.
incolumis
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“not”) and an unattested *columis or *calamis “damaged”, related to calamitās “loss, damage”. Schrijver explains the vowel ⟨o⟩ instead of the expected ⟨i⟩ by the influence of a…
incredibilis
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- + crēdibilis (“believable”), with the negative prefix and crēdibilis, from crēdō “to believe”.
incunabula
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- + cūnābula (“cradle”), from cūnae “cradle”.
indicatio
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin indicō (“to point out, put a price on”) + -tiō. ⟨indicō⟩ is from in- and dicō (“to proclaim, dedicate”).
indicium
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin index (“informer, pointer”) + -ium, ⟨index⟩ being from indicō “to point out”.
indico
205 BC–184 BC1. It is from Latin in- (“in, on”) + dicō (“to proclaim”), a first-conjugation verb beside the third-conjugation ⟨dīcere⟩ “to say”; index “informer, pointer” belongs to the same group. 2. The verb…
indigeo
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin indu- (“in”) + egeō (“to lack”).
induco
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“in, on”) + dūcō (“to lead”). Some inscriptions spell it ⟨indouc-⟩.
induo
205 BC–184 BCIt is formed from Latin indu- (“in”) + *uō (“to put on”), a verb also seen in exuō. The TLL reconstructs ⟨*ind-ovō⟩ and compares induviae, Umbrian ⟨anovihimu⟩ “let him put on” and Lithuanian ⟨aũti⟩…
industria
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin industrius (“active, diligent”), its feminine used as a noun, perhaps with opera “work” understood. De Vaan derives industrius from *endo-struwo-, built on struō “to build…
industrius
205 BC–184 BCIt is apparently from Latin indu (“in, within”) + struō (“to build”) + -ius, ⟨indu⟩ being the archaic prefix: Festus records an archaic form indostruus. Lewis and Short explain it as “building…
infamia
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin īnfāmis (“infamous”) + -ia; ⟨īnfāmis⟩ is from in- “not” and fāma “reputation”.
infamis
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“not”) + fāma (“reputation”) + -is.
inferior
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin īnferus (“below”), its comparative.
infero
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“in, into”) + ferō (“to carry”).
inferus
205 BC–184 BCIt is inherited from Proto-Italic *enþero- (“lower”), inherited from Proto-Indo-European *n̥dʰero- (“lower”). The /f/ is irregular inside a word, and is explained either as a dialectal form, as…
inficio
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“in”) + faciō (“to do, make”), literally “to put in”.
infidelis
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“not”) + fidēlis (“faithful”).
infimus
205 BC–184 BCIt is the superlative of īnferus “lower”, inherited from Proto-Italic *enðemos, inherited from Proto-Indo-European *n̥dʰm̥Hó- (“lowest”), from *n̥dʰér (“below”). The other superlative is īmus.
infitior
205 BC–184 BCIt is from ⟨*īnfitiae⟩ “denial”, seen in īnfitiās ⟨īre⟩ “to deny”, with -or, from Latin in- (“not”) + fateor (“to admit”), with the root of the verb. De Vaan has ⟨īnfitiās īre⟩ from Plautus among…
inflo
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- + flō (“to blow”).
ingens
205 BC–184 BCIts origin is disputed. The traditional view, kept by Lewis & Short and Köbler, takes it as in- “not” and gēns “kind”, “beyond its kind”. De Vaan follows Muller's proposal of Proto-Italic *mgant-…
ingenuus
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“in”) + gignō (“to beget”) + -uus, with the root of the verb, perhaps through ⟨*genowos⟩.
inhibeo
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- + habeō (“to have, hold”), with the vowel weakened to /i/. De Vaan traces ⟨habeō⟩ to Proto-Indo-European ⟨*gʰh₁bʰ-⟩ “to take”, with Oscan pruhipid (“would prevent”) formed like…
inicio
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“in, on”) + iaciō (“to throw”), with the vowel of the stem weakened to ⟨i⟩ in the compound.
inimicus
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“not”) + amīcus (“friendly, friend”). Amīcus is from amō “to love”.
iniuria
205 BC–184 BCIt is formed from Latin in- (“not”) + iūs (“law, right”) + -ia, or from the adjective iniūrius “unjust”. Iūs is *jowos (“oath, law”), which de Vaan traces to Proto-Indo-European *h₂oi-u (“vital…
inquino
205 BC–184 BCThe origin is uncertain. The OLD analyses it as in- (“in, on”) and a verb *quinō, apparently related to caenum “mud, filth” and cūniō “to defecate”, from which Festus derived it. Pokorny connects it…
insania
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin īnsānus (“mad”) + -ia, ⟨īnsānus⟩ being from in- “not” and sānus “sound, healthy”.
insanus
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- + sānus (“healthy, sound”), the negative prefix. Cicero remarks that the first syllable is long in ⟨īnsānus⟩, as in other compounds with ⟨in-⟩ before ⟨s⟩.
insisto
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“on”) + sistō (“to stand, set”).
insons
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“not”) + sōns (“guilty”). De Vaan traces ⟨sōns⟩ to Proto-Italic ⟨*sont-⟩ “being”, the old participle of “to be”, Proto-Indo-European *h₁s-ónt-s (“existing, real”), cognate with…
instituo
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“in, on”) + statuō (“to set up”), with the vowel weakened to ⟨i⟩.
insto
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“on, after”) + stō (“to stand”), developing from “to stand behind” to “to pursue, be imminent” and “to press, urge”. Its perfect forms cannot be told from those of īnsistō.
intellego
205 BC–184 BCIt is most likely from Latin inter- (“between”) + legō (“to gather, choose”), as “to choose between, discern”. Another view takes the second part from an unrelated Proto-Italic *legō “to care”. The…
interdico
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin inter- (“between”) + dīcō (“to say”): literally to speak in between, interpose.
interimo
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin inter- + emō (“to take”), “to take away from among”. De Vaan traces ⟨emō⟩ to Proto-Indo-European *h₁em- (“to take”).
intermitto
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin inter- (“between”) + mittō (“to send, let go”).
interpres
205 BC–184 BCIt is a compound from Latin inter (“between”), but the second part is unexplained. Walde and Hofmann took it as a back-formation from interpretor “to fix the value between”, from pretium “price”…
interpretor
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin interpres (“agent, interpreter”) + -or, the verb suffix. An active ⟨interpretō⟩ is also found, and Lucretius splits it by tmesis, ⟨inter quaecumque pretantur⟩.
intertraho
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin inter- + trahō (“to drag”). De Vaan reconstructs ⟨trahō⟩ as Proto-Italic *traxe/o-.
interventus
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin interveniō (“to come between, intervene”) + -tus, the action-noun suffix. De Vaan traces ⟨veniō⟩ to Proto-Indo-European *gʷm̥-yé- (“to come”).
intimus
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- + -timus, the superlative suffix, serving as the superlative of interior. Wiktionary traces it to Proto-Indo-European *h₁éntm̥mos (“innermost”), from Proto-Indo-European *h₁én…
intrico
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- + trīcae (“trifles, perplexities”) + -ō, the verbal suffix. The TLL compares extrīcō and trīcor.
intro
205 BC–184 BC1. The adverb is formed from Latin in + -ter + -ō. Wiktionary derives it from an earlier ⟨*interus⟩, the source of interior, from Proto-Indo-European *h₁énteros (“inner”); it is a doublet of intrā…
introduco
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin intrō (“inside”) + dūcō (“to lead”); manuscripts sometimes split it as ⟨intrō dūcō⟩.
intromitto
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin intrō (“inwards”) + mittō (“to send”).
invenio
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“upon”) + veniō (“to come”), so “to come upon”. Pomponius has an old future ⟨invenībit⟩ for ⟨inveniet⟩.
investigo
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- (“into”) + vestīgō (“to track”).
invideo
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin in- + videō (“to see”). Wiktionary explains that the meaning went from “look at” to “look askance at” to “envy”. Lewis and Short compare Ancient Greek βασκαίνω (baskaínō, “to…
invidia
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin invidus (“envious”) + -ia, from invideō (“to look askance at, envy”), a compound of in- and videō (“to see”). De Vaan traces ⟨videō⟩ to Proto-Italic *wid-ē-, Proto-Indo-European…
invito
205 BC–184 BCIts origin is uncertain. De Vaan posits a verb Proto-Italic *wītā-je/o- (“to pursue”), from Proto-Indo-European *wih₁-to- (“pursued”), prefixed with in-, the same root as invītus “unwilling”. Job…
irrito
205 BC–184 BCDe Vaan explains it as a verb from in- and a participle from Proto-Italic *rīto- (“stirred”), Proto-Indo-European *h₃riH-to- (“whirled, stirred”), from the root Proto-Indo-European *h₃reyH- (“to…
item
205 BC–184 BCIt is related to ita “thus” and itidem “in the same way”. Lewis & Short analyse it as the pronoun stem i- of is with an accusative ending, as in tam, and compare Sanskrit इत्थम् (itthám, “thus”)…
iucundus
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin iuvō (“to help, delight”) + -cundus, through ⟨*iuwicondos⟩.
iudicium
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin iūdex (“judge”) + -ium.
iudico
205 BC–184 BCIt is from Latin iūdex (“judge”) + -ō, the verbal suffix. Iūdex is a compound of iūs “law” and the root of dīcō “to say”. Some early inscriptions spell it ⟨ioud-⟩.
iugis
205 BC–184 BCIts origin is disputed. It was traditionally derived from iugum “yoke” and iungō “to join”, “joined together”, as the OLD still does. Weiss rejected this, since the meaning is “continual” from the…
iuncus
205 BC–184 BCIt is inherited from Proto-Italic *joiniko-, with the suffix *-ko- on a stem *ioini-, through *ioinko- and *iūnko-. De Vaan says the stem looks non-Indo-European. Cognate with Middle Irish aín…
iungo
205 BC–184 BCIt is inherited from Proto-Italic *jung-e/o-, inherited from Proto-Indo-European *(H)iu-n-g- (“to yoke”), a nasal present of the root *yewg- (“to yoke, join”), made thematic in Latin. From the same…