Etymology and origin of the English word merely
- Confidence
- Established
- Formation
- Derivation
- First attested
- c. 1449 Pecock, Repressor More words from the 15th century
- Ultimate origin
- Latin merus
Etymology
It is formed from English mere + -ly,[2][3][4][5] first as mereli.[6][7] The adjective is from Old French mier (“pure, entire”) and also comes directly from Latin merus (“unmixed, pure, bare”).[3][8][9] Barnhart traces the Latin word to Proto-Indo-European *mer- (“to glisten, sparkle”),[8] but Etymonline quotes de Vaan as seeing no compelling reason to derive "pure" from "shining".[3]
Earliest recorded meaning
Solely, purely: about 1449, in Pecock's Repressor, in the phrase pureli and mereli of dyuynyte.[6][2][3]
Semantic evolution
The adverb went through the same reversal as mere, which could mean both "nothing less than" and "nothing more than" from the 15th and 16th centuries.[8] It first meant without admixture, or exclusively (about 1449–1645), and without the help of others (about 1487–1608).[2] In 1546 it appears for "absolutely, entirely",[2] as in Shakespeare's Hamlet: "Things rank and gross in nature Possess it merely."[5] A short-lived use meant "as a matter of fact" (1596–1601).[2] The sense that survives, "only, and nothing more", is first recorded about 1580, in Sidney's translation of the Psalms,[2] and Johnson (1755) gave it alone, as "simply; only".[10] The Shorter Oxford and Chambers call "entirely" obsolete,[5][11] though the OED leaves it open and Merriam-Webster quotes it from the 20th-century writer Oliver La Farge.[2][4]
Timeline
- c. 1449 – purely, exclusively (obsolete by 1645).[6][2]
- c. 1487 – without the help of others (obsolete by 1608).[2]
- 1546 – absolutely, entirely.[2]
- c. 1580 – only, and nothing more.[2]
- 1596 – as a matter of fact (obsolete by 1601).[2]
Meanings
Adverb
- And nothing more; only, just: She merely shrugged and went on reading.[9][12][13][2]
- not merely, followed by but: not only: The plan was not merely costly but dangerous.[2]
- Entirely, quite, altogether.[4][2]
- (obsolete, c. 1449–1645) Purely; without admixture.[4][2][5][11]
Related words
Usage notes
Old English also had an adverb of this spelling with a separate source, from an older adjective mere, which meant "magnificently, splendidly" and died out by 1600; the corresponding adjective Old English mǣrlic did not survive into Middle English.[2]
References
- ^ a b Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
- ^ a b c d Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
- ^ a b c d Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c Kurath, Hans; Kuhn, Sherman M.; Lewis, Robert E., eds. (1952–2001), Middle English Dictionary, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; online edition ed. Frances McSparran et al. (2000–2018)
- ^ Dictionary.com Unabridged (2016), based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, New York: Random House
- ^ a b c Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
- ^ a b The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
- ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
- ^ a b The Chambers Dictionary (2014), 13th ed., Edinburgh: Chambers
- ^ Soanes, Catherine; Stevenson, Angus, eds. (2004), Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 11th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
Related etymologies
Cite this entry
“Merely.” Etymologically, 5 Nov. 2026, etymologically.com/en/merely. Accessed 5 Nov. 2026.
Last edited on . ·