Etymologically

Etymology and origin of the English word literal

Confidence
Established
Formation
Borrowing
First attested
a1398, J. Trevisa, translation of Bartholomaeus Anglicus
Borrowed from
Middle French literal
Ultimate origin
Latin littera

Pronunciation

  • /ˈlɪt(ə)ɹəl/[1]

Etymology

It is partly borrowed from Middle French literal and partly borrowed from Late Latin litterālis (“of letters or writing”),[2][3][4][5] from littera (“letter of the alphabet”),[3][4][6] plural litterae (“a letter, piece of writing”),[7] the word behind English letter.[5][8] Merriam-Webster derives it through Medieval Latin litteralis.[7] The French word meant "of literature" from the start of the 14th century, and by the late 14th century "of the letter of a text", taking its words in their primary meaning without allegory.[2] The Anglo-Norman Dictionary records it, in the sense "exact, to the letter", from 1410–15.[9]

Earliest recorded meaning

Relating to the letters of the alphabet, or expressed in letters: before 1398, in John Trevisa's translation of Bartholomaeus Anglicus.[2][4] Barnhart and Etymonline also find it before 1397, in the Wycliffe Bible, in the theological sense "not figurative or allegorical", which the OED dates to about 1443.[4][3][2]

Semantic evolution

The word's main history lies in Bible interpretation: the literal sense of Scripture, obtained by taking the words in their ordinary meaning, was opposed to its mystical or allegorical senses.[3][2][10] From there it came to mean the exact sense of the actual wording of a passage, or the primary or etymological sense of a word (1597),[2][3] and following the original word for word, as in a literal translation, from 1599.[4][3] Of a person or mind, apt to take words literally and miss metaphor or irony, it is recorded from 1633,[2] and literal-minded from 1791.[3] From 1624 it also meant "real, actual, without exaggeration".[2] Johnson (1755) gave the senses "according to the primitive meaning, not figurative" and "following the letter, or exact words".[11] The older link with letters survives in mathematics, where an expression using letters for quantities has been literal since 1673,[2] and in the noun, a misprint of a letter, recorded from 1622.[7] Senses meaning "of literature" (about 1450) and "of letters or epistles" (1650) are obsolete.[2]

Timeline

  • a1397 – not figurative or allegorical, in the Wycliffe Bible.[4]
  • a1398 – relating to the letters of the alphabet.[2][4]
  • c1443 – of the sense of a sacred text, obtained by taking its words in their ordinary meaning.[2]
  • c1450 – literary (obsolete by 1604).[2]
  • 1597 – of the primary or etymological sense of a word.[2]
  • 1599 – word for word, of a translation.[4][3]
  • 1622 – noun, a misprint.[7]
  • 1624 – real, actual, without exaggeration.[2]
  • 1633 – of a person, apt to take words literally.[2]
  • 1673 – in mathematics, using letters for quantities.[2]

Modern meaning

Adjective

  1. Taking words in their usual or most basic sense, without metaphor, allegory or exaggeration: The literal meaning of the place name is "white hill".
  2. Following the original word for word: a literal translation of the poem.
  3. Real, actual; exactly as described, without exaggeration.
  4. Of a person, unimaginative or prosaic; inclined to take what is said at face value.
  5. Of or expressed by letters of the alphabet; in mathematics, using letters for numbers or coefficients.

Noun

  1. (chiefly British, printing) A misprint or error of a letter in writing or typesetting.

Word family

  • literalness
  • literality
  • unliteral
  • biliteral
  • literalism
  • literalize
  • literally
  • literal-minded

Usage notes

The adverb literally (1530s) has long been used as an intensifier, meaning "virtually" or "in effect", a use Etymonline traces back to the late 17th century[3] and Dictionary.com to the early 19th;[12] it is widely criticized because it contradicts the word's sense "actually, without exaggeration".[12][3][13] Collins advises avoiding it in formal writing.[13] Weekley already noted in 1921 that literally was often used by the excited in the opposite of its real meaning.[14] Dictionary.com lists literal and littoral as easily confused.[12]

References

  1. ^ Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
  5. ^ a b The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  6. ^ Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
  7. ^ a b c d Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  8. ^ Skeat, Walter W. (1911), A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, new ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press
  9. ^ Anglo-Norman Dictionary (AND2), Aberystwyth University, anglo-norman.net (2nd ed., 2005–)
  10. ^ Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  11. ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
  12. ^ a b c Dictionary.com Unabridged (2016), based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, New York: Random House
  13. ^ a b Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins
  14. ^ Weekley, Ernest (1921), An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, London: John Murray

Related etymologies

Cite this entry

“Literal.” Etymologically, 22 Oct. 2026, etymologically.com/en/literal. Accessed 23 Oct. 2026.

Last edited on . ·