Etymologically

superfluous

Etymology and origin of the English word superfluous

Confidence
Established
Formation
Borrowing
First attested
1450 before 1450, J. Arderne More words from the 15th century
Borrowed from
Latin superfluus via Middle English
Ultimate origin
Latin fluō

Pronunciation

  • UK: /suːˈpɜːflu.əs/, /sjʊˈpɜːflu.əs/[1]
  • US: /suˈpɝflu.əs/[1]

Etymology

It is inherited from Middle English superfluous, also superfluus,[2][3] borrowed from Latin superfluus (“overflowing, unnecessary”),[4][5][3][6][7][8] with the English suffix -ous.[4][2][7] The Latin adjective is from superfluō (“to overflow”),[5][3][9][7] from super- (“over”) and fluō (“to flow”),[5][3][9][8] from Proto-Indo-European *bhleu-.[9] Barnhart sees the influence of Old French superflueux,[3] which the American Heritage Dictionary takes as the direct source.[9] English first had superflue, from the late 14th century, from Old French.[5][10]

Earliest recorded meaning

Present in more than the desired or needed quantity; excessive: before 1450, in J. Arderne.[4][2] Barnhart dates the word to before 1398, as superfluus in Trevisa's translation of Bartholomew's De Proprietatibus Rerum,[3] but the OED treats that passage, on a number smaller than the sum of its factors, as the Latin adjective used in a Middle English context.[4]

Semantic evolution

The literal Latin idea of overflowing had already become "more than is needed" before the word reached English.[5][6] The two main senses appear together in the mid-15th century: more than is sufficient, and (about 1450, in a translation of Boccaccio) not needed at all.[4] The Middle English Dictionary also has a mathematical use, for a number whose aliquot parts add up to more than itself.[2] In early modern English the word could mean immoderate or overindulgent (about 1475–1815) and overabundantly supplied (1531–1789),[4] and it was used of pointless or vain things (before 1533–1654).[4][7] From 1598, in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part 1, it could describe a person doing more than necessary.[4][7] Johnson (1755) gave "exuberant; more than enough; unnecessary", and added that a thing could offend by being more than sufficient.[11] Later special uses are "superfluous hair" (from 1597, in Gerard's Herball),[4] the musical sense equal to "augmented" (from 1664)[4][7] and the 19th-century label for women unlikely to marry because of a gender imbalance in the population (from 1855).[4]

Timeline

  • before 1450 – more than is required; excessive.[4][2]
  • c. 1450 – not needed; unnecessary, uncalled for.[4]
  • c. 1475 – immoderate, overindulgent (obsolete by 1815).[4]
  • 1513 – of an action expressed by an infinitive, usually with anticipatory it.[4]
  • 1531 – overabundantly supplied (obsolete by 1789).[4]
  • before 1533 – pointless, vain (obsolete by 1654).[4]
  • 1552 – noun, the superfluous, that which is unnecessary.[4]
  • 1597 – of hair on the face or body, unwanted.[4]
  • 1598 – of a person, doing more than is necessary.[4]
  • 1664 – in music, augmented.[4]
  • 1855 – of a woman, unlikely to marry because of a gender imbalance.[4]

Meanings

Adjective

  1. More than is sufficient or wanted; excessive: He trimmed the superfluous fat from the budget.[12][13][4]
  2. Not needed or relevant; unnecessary, redundant: A long introduction seemed superfluous.[12][4][7]
  3. Of hair on the face or body, thought excessive and usually removed.[4]
  4. (music) Augmented (historical, rare).[4][7]
  5. Immoderate, overindulgent (obsolete, 1475–1815).[4][7]
  6. Extravagant, or oversupplied with something (obsolete, 1531–1789).[4][12]
  7. Ineffective, pointless (obsolete, 1533–1654).[4][7]

Noun

  1. the superfluous: that which is unnecessary.[4][7]

Word family

  • superfluously
  • superfluousness
  • unsuperfluous
  • superfluity

References

  1. ^ a b Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e Kurath, Hans; Kuhn, Sherman M.; Lewis, Robert E., eds. (1952–2001), Middle English Dictionary, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; online edition ed. Frances McSparran et al. (2000–2018)
  3. ^ a b c d e f Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 27 28 29 30 Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  5. ^ a b c d e Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  6. ^ a b Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  8. ^ a b Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
  9. ^ a b c d The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  10. ^ Mayhew, A. L.; Skeat, Walter W. (1888), A Concise Dictionary of Middle English from A.D. 1150 to 1580, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  11. ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
  12. ^ a b c Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins
  13. ^ Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster

Related etymologies

Cite this entry

“Superfluous.” Etymologically, 5 Nov. 2026, etymologically.com/en/superfluous. Accessed 5 Nov. 2026.

Last edited on . ·