Etymology and origin of the English word superfluous
- Confidence
- Established
- Formation
- Borrowing
- First attested
- 1450 before 1450, J. Arderne More words from the 15th century
- Borrowed from
- Latin superfluus via Middle English
- Ultimate origin
- Latin fluō
Etymology
It is inherited from Middle English superfluous, also superfluus,[2][3] borrowed from Latin superfluus (“overflowing, unnecessary”),[4][5][3][6][7][8] with the English suffix -ous.[4][2][7] The Latin adjective is from superfluō (“to overflow”),[5][3][9][7] from super- (“over”) and fluō (“to flow”),[5][3][9][8] from Proto-Indo-European *bhleu-.[9] Barnhart sees the influence of Old French superflueux,[3] which the American Heritage Dictionary takes as the direct source.[9] English first had superflue, from the late 14th century, from Old French.[5][10]
Earliest recorded meaning
Present in more than the desired or needed quantity; excessive: before 1450, in J. Arderne.[4][2] Barnhart dates the word to before 1398, as superfluus in Trevisa's translation of Bartholomew's De Proprietatibus Rerum,[3] but the OED treats that passage, on a number smaller than the sum of its factors, as the Latin adjective used in a Middle English context.[4]
Semantic evolution
The literal Latin idea of overflowing had already become "more than is needed" before the word reached English.[5][6] The two main senses appear together in the mid-15th century: more than is sufficient, and (about 1450, in a translation of Boccaccio) not needed at all.[4] The Middle English Dictionary also has a mathematical use, for a number whose aliquot parts add up to more than itself.[2] In early modern English the word could mean immoderate or overindulgent (about 1475–1815) and overabundantly supplied (1531–1789),[4] and it was used of pointless or vain things (before 1533–1654).[4][7] From 1598, in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part 1, it could describe a person doing more than necessary.[4][7] Johnson (1755) gave "exuberant; more than enough; unnecessary", and added that a thing could offend by being more than sufficient.[11] Later special uses are "superfluous hair" (from 1597, in Gerard's Herball),[4] the musical sense equal to "augmented" (from 1664)[4][7] and the 19th-century label for women unlikely to marry because of a gender imbalance in the population (from 1855).[4]
Timeline
- before 1450 – more than is required; excessive.[4][2]
- c. 1450 – not needed; unnecessary, uncalled for.[4]
- c. 1475 – immoderate, overindulgent (obsolete by 1815).[4]
- 1513 – of an action expressed by an infinitive, usually with anticipatory it.[4]
- 1531 – overabundantly supplied (obsolete by 1789).[4]
- before 1533 – pointless, vain (obsolete by 1654).[4]
- 1552 – noun, the superfluous, that which is unnecessary.[4]
- 1597 – of hair on the face or body, unwanted.[4]
- 1598 – of a person, doing more than is necessary.[4]
- 1664 – in music, augmented.[4]
- 1855 – of a woman, unlikely to marry because of a gender imbalance.[4]
Meanings
Adjective
- More than is sufficient or wanted; excessive: He trimmed the superfluous fat from the budget.[12][13][4]
- Not needed or relevant; unnecessary, redundant: A long introduction seemed superfluous.[12][4][7]
- Of hair on the face or body, thought excessive and usually removed.[4]
- (music) Augmented (historical, rare).[4][7]
- Immoderate, overindulgent (obsolete, 1475–1815).[4][7]
- Extravagant, or oversupplied with something (obsolete, 1531–1789).[4][12]
- Ineffective, pointless (obsolete, 1533–1654).[4][7]
Noun
Word family
- superfluously
- superfluousness
- unsuperfluous
- superfluity
Related words
References
- ^ a b Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
- ^ a b c d e Kurath, Hans; Kuhn, Sherman M.; Lewis, Robert E., eds. (1952–2001), Middle English Dictionary, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; online edition ed. Frances McSparran et al. (2000–2018)
- ^ a b c d e f Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 27 28 29 30 Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d e Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
- ^ a b Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
- ^ Mayhew, A. L.; Skeat, Walter W. (1888), A Concise Dictionary of Middle English from A.D. 1150 to 1580, Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
- ^ a b c Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins
- ^ Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
Related etymologies
- crustacean · also from Latin
- memento · also from Latin
- ardor · also from Latin
- mete · also from Latin
- superlative · also from Latin
- magnify · also from Latin
- congregate · also from Latin
- stupor · also from Latin
Cite this entry
“Superfluous.” Etymologically, 5 Nov. 2026, etymologically.com/en/superfluous. Accessed 5 Nov. 2026.
Last edited on . ·