Etymology and origin of the English word naught
- Confidence
- Established
- Formation
- Compound
- First attested
- c. 897 King Alfred's translation of Gregory's Pastoral Care More words from the 9th century
- Ultimate origin
- Old English nāwiht
Pronunciation
- UK: /nɔːt/[1]
Etymology
It is inherited from Middle English naught, also naht, noht, noght and nought,[2][1] inherited from Old English nāwiht (“nothing”), also nōwiht,[3][2][4][5] literally "no whit",[3][6] formed from Old English nā (“no”) + wiht (“thing, creature, being”).[3][7][8][9] The first element goes back to Proto-Indo-European *ne- (“not”).[3][7] The OED allows either that analysis or a formation from ne (“not”) and aught,[10] which is how Wiktionary and Johnson explain it.[1][11] Similar compounds are Old Saxon neowiht, Old High German niwiht and Gothic 𐌽𐌹 𐍅𐌰𐌹𐌷𐍄𐍃 (ni waihts);[2][3] Etymonline adds Dutch niet and German nicht.[3] The spelling nought continues the variant with o, which Collins and the Shorter Oxford derive from the same negative and ōwiht (“something”),[12][5] although the OED notes that Middle English forms with o may also come from nāht by rounding of the vowel.[10] Skeat calls not a doublet.[13]
Earliest recorded meaning
Nothing, not anything: in King Alfred's translation of Gregory's Pastoral Care,[10] dated c. 897 in the 1989 edition of the OED.[14] Barnhart dates nōwiht to about 830,[2] and the OED's earliest record of that form is the Vespasian Psalter.[10] The same text of Alfred's also has the noun for wickedness.[10]
Semantic evolution
From "nothing" Old English moved to fixed phrases: to bring to naught first meant to reduce to nothing and destroy, later to frustrate, and to come to naught first meant to perish, later to fail.[10] For naught, in vain, is recorded from about 1225,[10] and in the sense "without payment" from 1568.[10] Used as a predicate, the noun passed into an adjective, "worthless, bad", already in Old English;[10][8][5] by the 16th century it had narrowed to "morally bad, wicked".[3][15] That job then fell to the derivative naughty,[3][8][16] and Johnson noted in 1773 that the adjective was hardly used except in ludicrous language.[11] The arithmetical use, "zero, cipher", appears about 1430 under the spelling nought,[14][3] and the form naught is recorded for the figure 0 from 1649,[15][5] and in the United States for no quantity at all from 1864.[15] The score of no points in a game is recorded as nought from 1862.[14] The OED explains that the spellings with o and with a stayed apart in Middle English because they sounded different, but that a pronunciation of -ough- like -augh- entered standard English during the 17th century, after which the two sounded alike; it finds no clear difference of meaning from the Old English period on.[10] Dialect kept further forms, Scots nocht and northern nowt.[5] A rare verb "to annihilate" has been used in theology and poetry in the 20th century.[10][5]
Timeline
- c. 897 – nothing; also wickedness, evil (obsolete by 1649).[14][10]
- Old English – to bring to naught, to destroy, and to come to naught, to perish.[10]
- Old English – as an adjective, worthless, bad.[5][3]
- c. 1225 – for naught, in vain.[10]
- c. 1430 – the spelling nought for the arithmetical zero.[14] Etymonline dates this meaning to the early 15th century.[3]
- 1536 – morally bad, wicked.[15]
- 1542 – to call all to naught, to denounce with passion.[10]
- 1568 – for naught, without payment or reward.[10]
- 1649 – the figure 0.[15][5]
- 1862 – nought, a score of no points in a game.[14]
- 1864 – in the United States, no quantity, zero.[15]
- 1913 – to bring to naught, annihilate.[14] The revised OED has its first example of this sense in 1958.[10]
Meanings
Pronoun
- (archaic, literary) Nothing; not anything: Their long search had yielded naught. Also spelled nought.[12][4][10][5]
- bring to naught: to ruin or frustrate, with come to naught for failing or ending in nothing.[4][10][5]
- set at naught: to disregard or scorn.[12][5][11]
- for naught: in vain; also, without payment.[10][5]
Noun
- The figure 0, zero or no quantity, usually spelled nought in Britain, with naught chiefly American: Multiply by ten and add a nought.[12][4][5][15]
- (archaic, rare) Nothingness; what does not exist.[12][4][10]
- (obsolete, Old English–1649) Wickedness; evil, moral wrong.[10][4][5]
Adjective
Adverb
- (archaic, literary) Not at all: His threats availed naught.[12]
Verb
- (rare) To bring to nothing; to annihilate, chiefly in theology and poetry.[10][5]
Word family
Related words
Usage notes
Fowler (1926) wrote that the variation in spelling goes back to Old English, and that the distinction by then usually drawn was only a matter of convenience: nought as the name of the cipher 0, naught for the archaic, poetic and rhetorical uses meaning "nothing".[3] Collins treats naught as archaic or literary, and as a chiefly American spelling of nought, the digit 0.[12] The OED finds that the two spellings varied freely down to the 20th century, sometimes between editions of one work.[10] Johnson had called the spelling nought common but improper.[11]
References
- ^ a b c Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
- ^ a b c d Barnhart, Robert K., ed. (1995), The Barnhart Concise Dictionary of Etymology, New York: HarperCollins
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
- ^ a b c d e f g Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
- ^ a b The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
- ^ a b c Hoad, T. F., ed. (1986), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d e Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins
- ^ Skeat, Walter W. (1911), A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, new ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ a b c d e f g Simpson, J. A.; Weiner, E. S. C., eds. (1989), The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ a b c d e f g h Kay, Christian; Roberts, Jane; Samuels, Michael; Wotherspoon, Irené, eds. (2009), Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford University Press; online edition (2024)
- ^ Partridge, Eric (1966), Origins: A Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, 4th ed., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Related etymologies
Cite this entry
“Naught.” Etymologically, 5 Nov. 2026, etymologically.com/en/naught. Accessed 6 Nov. 2026.
Last edited on . ·