Etymologically

Etymology and origin of the English word concur

Confidence
Established
Formation
Borrowing
First attested
1410 Walton's Boethius
Borrowed from
Latin concurro via Middle English
Ultimate origin
Latin currō
Etymology tree
inherited borrowed derived
Latin curro
French courir
Italian correre
Latin concurro
English concur
From the same root
Latin accurro ← curro
Latin curso ← curro
Latin cursor ← curro
Latin cursus ← curro
Latin discurro ← curro
Latin excurro ← curro
Latin praecurro ← curro
Latin recurro ← curro
Latin succurro ← curro
Latin transcurro ← curro
French courant ← courir
Italian corridoio ← correre

Pronunciation

  • UK: /kənˈkɜː/, /kəŋˈkɜː/[1]
  • US: /kənˈkɝ/[1]

Etymology

It is inherited from Middle English concurren,[2][3][4][5] borrowed from Latin concurrō (“to run together, assemble; to clash; to coincide”),[6][7][3][5][8] formed from con- (“together”) and currō (“to run”),[6][7][9][10] from Proto-Indo-European *kers- (“to run”).[7][3] The OED takes the hostile sense, to rush together in battle, as apparently the first in English, and compares French concourir, recorded in the 16th century.[6] It is related to concourse, course and current.[11][9][4]

Earliest recorded meaning

To act together, to work in concert: in John Walton's translation of Boethius (1410), as the MED and Barnhart date it.[2][5] Etymonline gives the early 15th century, with the sense to collide or clash in hostility,[7] and the OED's first record is from Gavin Douglas's translation of the Aeneid, before 1522, in the senses to collide and to rush at each other.[6]

Semantic evolution

The Latin verb's range of senses, from running together in a crowd or in battle to happening at the same time, came into English within a century.[7][6] The violent senses died out by the end of the 17th century,[6][12] and the peaceful senses of meeting and flowing together, and of lines converging, also became obsolete.[6][12] Agreeing in opinion is recorded in the MED in 1433,[2] and in the OED from 1590;[6] coinciding in time is recorded from 1596.[6][7] Johnson (1755) gave "to meet in one point" first and "to agree; to join in one action, or opinion" second.[13] Weekley notes that in the 16th and 17th centuries it was often replaced, as a feeble joke, by condog.[14] In church use, two feasts concur when they fall on consecutive days so that their vespers coincide (1863).[6]

Timeline

  • 1410 – to act together.[2][5]
  • 1433 – to agree, to be of one opinion.[2] The OED's first record of this sense is from 1590.[6]
  • before 1522 – to collide; to rush at each other in hostility (both obsolete by the late 17th century).[6]
  • 1548 – to flow together (obsolete).[6]
  • c. 1550 – of people, to co-operate.[6]
  • 1570 – of lines, to converge and meet (obsolete).[6]
  • 1596 – to happen together, to coincide.[6][7]
  • 1863 – of two church feasts, to fall on consecutive days.[6]

Meanings

Verb

  1. To agree or be of the same opinion; to express agreement: The committee concurred with the report's findings.[15][4][6]
  2. To act together or combine to produce an effect; to cooperate.[15][4][6]
  3. To happen at the same time; to coincide.[15][4][6]
  4. (rare) To converge or meet in one point.[15][12]
  5. (obsolete, 1522–1693) To collide; to rush together in battle.[6][12]

Word family

  • concurringly
  • unconcurring
  • nonconcur

References

  1. ^ a b Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e Kurath, Hans; Kuhn, Sherman M.; Lewis, Robert E., eds. (1952–2001), Middle English Dictionary, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; online edition ed. Frances McSparran et al. (2000–2018)
  3. ^ a b c The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  4. ^ a b c d e Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  5. ^ a b c d Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  8. ^ Hoad, T. F., ed. (1986), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  9. ^ a b Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
  10. ^ Skeat, Walter W. (1911), A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, new ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press
  11. ^ Dictionary.com Unabridged (2016), based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, New York: Random House
  12. ^ a b c d Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  13. ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
  14. ^ Weekley, Ernest (1921), An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, London: John Murray
  15. ^ a b c d Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins

Related etymologies

  • turn · also from Latin
  • act · also from Latin
  • form · also from Latin
  • major · also from Latin
  • type · also from Latin
  • religion · also from Latin
  • wine · also from Latin
  • arm · also from Latin
Cite this entry

“Concur.” Etymologically, 1 Nov. 2026, etymologically.com/en/concur. Accessed 1 Nov. 2026.

Last edited on . ·