recens
Pronunciation
Forms
recēns (genitive recentis, comparative recentior, superlative recentissimus); third-declension one-termination adjective[1]
Etymology
It is probably a compound, inherited from Proto-Italic *wre-kent(i)-, of re- (“again”) and a word for “young, first”, from Proto-Indo-European *ken-t- (“young, new”).[2][3][1] The TLL explains the meaning as “having a new beginning”.[3]
Cognate with Old Irish cét- (“first”), Sanskrit कन्या (kanyā́, “girl”) and Ancient Greek καινός (kainós, “new”).[2][3]
Earliest recorded meaning
It is found from Plautus onwards,[2][4] who says that a fish “is worthless unless it is fresh”.[5]
Semantic evolution
It meant recent, lately done or made, as in Terence's “while this grief is fresh”, and of troops fresh and not yet tired, as in Caesar.[5] Of food it meant fresh, as Cato's fresh cheese, and with ab it meant fresh from, as a foal just born.[5] Things were fresh in the memory, and later writers were called recentes, “modern”.[5][6] It was also an adverb, “lately, just”.[5]
Medieval Latin used it for food that was not salted,[7][4] and English law spoke of vis recens, “fresh force”.[8] It survives as Italian and Portuguese recente and Spanish reciente, and English took recent in the early 15th century.[1][9]
Timeline
- c. 250–184 BC – Plautus uses it of fresh fish.[5][4]
- 190–159 BC – Terence uses it of fresh grief.[5][4]
- 234–149 BC – Cato uses it of fresh cheese.[5][4]
- c. 50 BC – Caesar uses it of fresh troops.[5][4]
- early 15th century – English recent is first recorded, of fresh food.[9]
Meanings
Adjective
- Recent, new, lately made or done.[5][10]
- (of troops) Fresh, not tired.[5][1]
- (of food) Fresh.[5]
- recens ab Fresh from, just after.[5]
- Fresh in the memory.[5]
- (of writers) Modern.[6][1]
- (Medieval Latin, of food) Unsalted.[7]
Adverb
Word family
- recentarius
- recentor
Related words
- English recent
Usage notes
Döderlein distinguishes novus, new as what did not exist before, the opposite of antiquus, from recens, new as what has not long existed, the opposite of vetus.[11]
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
- ^ a b c de Vaan, Michiel (2008), Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages, Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 7, Leiden; Boston: Brill
- ^ a b c Thesaurus linguae Latinae (1900–), Leipzig: Teubner; Berlin: De Gruyter; open-access ed., Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften
- ^ a b c d e f Köbler, Gerhard (2010), Lateinisches Abkunfts- und Wirkungswörterbuch für Altertum und Mittelalter, online ed., koeblergerhard.de
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Glare, P. G. W., ed. (2012), Oxford Latin Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b Georges, Karl Ernst (1913–1918), Ausführliches lateinisch-deutsches Handwörterbuch, 8th ed., ed. Heinrich Georges, Hannover; Leipzig: Hahn
- ^ a b Niermeyer, J. F. (1976), Mediae Latinitatis Lexicon Minus, Leiden: Brill
- ^ Latham, R. E., D. R. Howlett, R. K. Ashdowne, et al. (1975–2013), Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British Sources, London: British Academy / Oxford University Press
- ^ a b Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
- ^ Lewis, Charlton T.; Short, Charles (1879), A Latin Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ Döderlein, Ludwig (1874), Döderlein’s Hand-book of Latin Synonymes, tr. H. H. Arnold, Andover: W. F. Draper