Etymologically

irrationalis

This is the current revision of this entry, as edited by bogdan on 20 October 2026 at 12:55. This address is a permanent link to this version.

Pronunciation

  • Classical: [ɪr.ra.ti.oːˈnaː.lɪs][1]
  • Ecclesiastical: [ir.rat.t͡si.oˈnaː.lis][1]

Forms

irratiōnālis (neuter irratiōnāle); third-declension two-termination adjective[1]

Etymology

It is from Latin in- (“not”) + ratiōnālis (“rational, of reason”).[2][1][3] De Vaan derives ratiō (“calculation, account, reason”) from the participle of reor (“to think, reckon”), whose original sense he takes to be “to count”; he traces the verb to Proto-Italic *rē- and Proto-Indo-European *Hreh₁-.[4]

Earliest recorded meaning

Köbler records it first in Celsus.[3] In the 1st century AD Seneca and Quintilian use it of a creature without reason, animal irratiōnāle.[5][6]

Semantic evolution

Lewis & Short mark it as post-Augustan.[5] It describes beings without the power of reason, above all animals,[5][6] and Quintilian also uses it of a practice done mechanically, without method, for which he gives a Greek equivalent.[2][6] He also uses the neuter plural irratiōnālia as a noun, “creatures without reason”.[5] The grammarians Diomedes and Martianus Capella set it against ratiōnālis.[6] In Christian Latin Tertullian speaks of an anima irratiōnālis and has the adverb irratiōnāliter, “irrationally”.[5] In medieval British Latin it is used of souls, animals and the world, of faculties or acts without a rational foundation, and in mathematics of an irrational line, also called surda.[7]

Timeline

  • 14–37 AD – First recorded, in Celsus.[3]
  • 4 BC–65 AD – Seneca, in his letters, of animals without reason.[5][3]
  • c. 35–95/96 AD – Quintilian, of animals and of mechanical practice.[2][5][3]
  • c. 160–220 AD – Tertullian, of the soul, and the adverb irratiōnāliter.[5][3]

Meanings

Adjective

  1. Without reason, irrational, unreasoning (of animals and other beings).[2][5][6]
  2. Done without method, mechanical (of practice or exercise).[2][5][6]
  3. (as a noun, neuter plural) Creatures or things without reason.[5]
  4. (Medieval Latin) Lacking a rational basis, unreasonable.[7]
  5. (Medieval Latin, mathematics) Irrational, surd (of a line or quantity).[7]

Usage notes

The OLD treats it as the same word as irratiōnābilis, “unreasoning, irrational”;[2] spellings with inr- occur in manuscripts.[5][8]

References

  1. ^ a b c d Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e f Glare, P. G. W., ed. (2012), Oxford Latin Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. ^ a b c d e f Köbler, Gerhard (2010), Lateinisches Abkunfts- und Wirkungswörterbuch für Altertum und Mittelalter, online ed., koeblergerhard.de
  4. ^ de Vaan, Michiel (2008), Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages, Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 7, Leiden; Boston: Brill
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Lewis, Charlton T.; Short, Charles (1879), A Latin Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  6. ^ a b c d e f Georges, Karl Ernst (1913–1918), Ausführliches lateinisch-deutsches Handwörterbuch, 8th ed., ed. Heinrich Georges, Hannover; Leipzig: Hahn
  7. ^ a b c Latham, R. E., D. R. Howlett, R. K. Ashdowne, et al. (1975–2013), Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British Sources, London: British Academy / Oxford University Press
  8. ^ Thesaurus linguae Latinae (1900–), Leipzig: Teubner; Berlin: De Gruyter; open-access ed., Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften