dis-
Pronunciation
Forms
dis- (dī- before b, d, g, l, m, n, r and consonantal u, dif- before f, dir- before vowels)[2][3]
Etymology
It is inherited from Proto-Italic *dis- (“in two, apart”).[3][1] De Vaan takes it as cognate with Ancient Greek διά (diá, “in two, apart, through”), from ⟨*dis-a⟩, and relates it to Proto-Indo-European *dui- (“two, into two”);[3][1] Wiktionary gives Proto-Indo-European *d(w)is- (“in two, apart”) and calls the details disputed.[3][1] Unlike the Greek word, it was never a free preposition in Latin: the oldest texts have it almost only before verbs.[3][4] The early adjective difficilis has the sense “not, the opposite of”, so it may contain Proto-Indo-European *dus- (“apart; bad”), though others take it as built from facilis after the model of similis and dissimilis.[3] De Vaan also considers a dissimilation of ⟨*dwis-⟩ to ⟨*dis-⟩ before verbs beginning with ⟨w⟩, as in dīvidō.[3]
Cognate with Old English te- and Old High German ze-.[2][5]
Earliest recorded meaning
It is found from Livius Andronicus on,[3] prefixed to verbs in the sense “apart, away”.[3]
Semantic evolution
It marks separation or dispersal, often the reversal of an earlier process, and in some words simply negation (as in dissimilis and displiceō); an intensifying use (disamō, discupiō) seems to be colloquial.[2]
In classical Latin it ran parallel to dē- with much the same meaning, but in Late Latin it became the preferred form and passed into Old French as des-;[5] English has it from French and directly from Latin, for “not”, “do the opposite of” and “apart”.[5]
Meanings
Prefix
- Apart, asunder, in two; in different directions.[2][1]
- Denoting the reversal of a process, or removal.[2][1]
- Not, the opposite of.[2][5]
- (colloquial, intensive) Utterly, exceedingly.[2][1]
Word family
Related words
- bis
- English dis-
Usage notes
The Senatus consultum de Bacchanalibus still has dismota, where later Latin has dī-.[3] Gothic took the prefix over as dis-.[3]
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
- ^ a b c d e f g Glare, P. G. W., ed. (2012), Oxford Latin Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k de Vaan, Michiel (2008), Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages, Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 7, Leiden; Boston: Brill
- ^ Thesaurus linguae Latinae (1900–), Leipzig: Teubner; Berlin: De Gruyter; open-access ed., Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften
- ^ a b c d Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com