- Confidence
- Established
- Formation
- Borrowing
- First attested
- 1541
- Borrowed from
- Latin stupidus
- Ultimate origin
- Latin (stupeō)
Pronunciation
- IPA: UK /ˈstjuː.pɪd/, US /ˈstuː.pɪd/[1]
Etymology
It is borrowed from Latin stupidus (“amazed, confounded; dull, foolish”),[2][3] perhaps partly borrowed from Middle French stupide,[2][4] from stupeō (“I am stunned, amazed, struck senseless”),[3][2] which is akin to Greek týptein “to beat, strike”, the source of type.[2][4] Etymonline takes it to Proto-Indo-European *(s)teu- (“to push, knock, beat”).[3] Old English had no single word for the idea, using unwīs, dol (the source of dull) and dysig (the source of dizzy).[3]
Earliest recorded meaning
“Slow or dull in thinking”: 1541, in Copland's translation of Galen's Terapeutyke,[2][5][4] the 1540s.[3]
Semantic evolution
Stupid long kept its link with stupor: “stunned, dumbfounded, stupefied” is attested from the 1610s,[3][5] was very common in Dryden, and lasted into the mid-18th century;[3] it is now archaic.[3][6] Blount's dictionary of 1656 defines it only as “dismaid, abashed, astonied, amazed, senceless”.[3] The slow-witted sense eventually became the main meaning.[7] Of ideas or actions, “showing stupidity”, it is from 1621,[2][5] and “dull, pointless” by 1778.[3] The noun, “a stupid person”, is from 1712, in Steele's Spectator.[2][3] Stupidity is also from 1541.[2]
Timeline
- 1541 – slow-witted.[2][5]
- 1611 – stunned, stupefied.[5]
- 1621 – of actions, showing stupidity.[2][5]
- 1656 – Blount: dismayed, amazed.[3]
- 1712 – noun, a stupid person.[2][3]
- 1778 – dull, pointless.[3]
Modern meaning
Adjective
- Lacking intelligence or common sense; slow to learn or understand.
- Showing a lack of good sense: a stupid mistake.
- Boring or annoying; pointless.
- (archaic) In a stupor; dazed.
Noun
- (informal) A stupid person.
Word family
- stupidly
- stupidness
- unstupid
- stupidity
Related words
- stupefy
- stupor
- stupendous
- type
Usage notes
Stupid is the most general of the words meaning lacking intelligence;[8] slow and dumb suggest a slowness to learn,[8] while dull suggests a lack of mental sharpness and obtuse an inability to understand.[8]
References
- ^ Jones, Daniel (2011), Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary, 18th ed., ed. Peter Roach, Jane Setter and John Esling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
- ^ a b c Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
- ^ a b c d e f Simpson, J. A.; Weiner, E. S. C., eds. (1989), The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ Hoad, T. F., ed. (1986), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ Cresswell, Julia (2021), Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (1992), 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Related etymologies
Cite this entry
“Stupid.” Etymologically, 15 Oct. 2026, etymologically.com/en/stupid. Accessed 15 Oct. 2026.
Last edited on . ·