Etymologically

Etymology and origin of the English word mutilate

Confidence
Established
Formation
Borrowing
First attested
1522 before 1522, G. Douglas's Virgil (adjective) More words from the 16th century
Borrowed from
Latin mutilatus
Ultimate origin
Latin mutilus

Pronunciation

  • /ˈmjuː.tɪˌleɪt/[1]

Etymology

It is borrowed from Latin mutilātus (“maimed, cut off”),[2][3][4][5] the past participle of mutilō (“to cut or lop off, to maim”),[2][6][3][7] from mutilus (“maimed, without horns”).[2][7][8] The adjective came first, and Barnhart thinks the verb grew partly out of it and was partly borrowed directly.[3] The OED calls this adjective of unknown origin and Etymonline of uncertain etymology.[2][5] It is often compared with Old Irish mut (“short”),[2][4][9][10] and with Scottish Gaelic mutach (“short and thick”),[9][10] and is akin to muticus (“docked”).[4][10] Barnhart gives Proto-Indo-European *mutos (“curtailed”),[3] and Weekley compared Ancient Greek μύτιλος (mútilos, “hornless”).[11]

Earliest recorded meaning

Having some part destroyed or missing, of a thing: the adjective, before 1522, in G. Douglas's translation of Virgil.[2][4] The verb, to spoil a book or other text by cutting out a part, is first recorded in 1534, in Thomas More.[2][3][4]

Semantic evolution

Partridge glosses the Latin verb as first "to de-horn", then "to maim".[10] In English the adjective was used of a body from 1525.[2] The verb was applied first to writings and books, in the 1530s, and then to people, in the 1560s according to Etymonline and about 1570 according to the OED,[5][2] and the two senses have run side by side since.[2][12] Etymonline adds that it properly means to take away a principal part, stressing the harm done to wholeness and beauty.[5] An extended use, to cut something back until it no longer works or to change it ruinously, is also recorded about 1570.[2] Johnson (1755) gave only "to deprive of some essential part", with quotations about ribs and mutilated texts of old poets.[13] In biology the adjective described a creature or plant lacking a part common to its relatives (1760–1885), and the noun, from 1863 in J. D. Dana, a member of the former order Mutilata of aquatic mammals.[2][4] The noun mutilation is older than the verb, from 1525.[3]

Timeline

  • before 1522 – adjective, of a thing, with a part missing.[2][4]
  • 1525 – adjective, of a body, lacking a limb.[2]
  • 1534 – verb, to spoil a text by cutting out a part.[2][3]
  • c. 1570 – verb, to deprive a person or animal of a limb or organ.[2] Etymonline has the 1560s.[5]
  • c. 1570 – verb, extended, to cut back or change ruinously.[2]
  • 1760 – adjective, in biology, lacking a part common to related forms (obsolete by 1885).[2]
  • 1863 – noun, a member of the former order of aquatic mammals, Mutilata (obsolete by 1870).[2]

Meanings

Verb

  1. To cut off or destroy a limb or other essential part of a person or animal; to maim: The trap had mutilated the fox's hind leg.[14][4][2]
  2. To spoil a text or other thing by removing or damaging a part: The censor mutilated the letter with scissors.[14][4][2]
  3. To cut back or change something so severely that it no longer works as it should.[2][4]

Adjective

  1. Mutilated (now literary).[2][12][4]
  2. (biology) Lacking a part that related forms have, as a cetacean lacks hind limbs (obsolete, 1760–1885).[2][12][4]

Noun

  1. A cetacean or sirenian (obsolete, 1863–1870).[2][12][4]

Word family

  • muticous

References

  1. ^ Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  5. ^ a b c d e Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  6. ^ Ayto, John (2005), Word Origins: The Secret Histories of English Words from A to Z, 2nd ed., London: A & C Black
  7. ^ a b The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  8. ^ Hoad, T. F., ed. (1986), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  9. ^ a b Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
  10. ^ a b c d Partridge, Eric (1966), Origins: A Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, 4th ed., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  11. ^ Weekley, Ernest (1921), An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, London: John Murray
  12. ^ a b c d Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  13. ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
  14. ^ a b Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins

Related etymologies

Cite this entry

“Mutilate.” Etymologically, 5 Nov. 2026, etymologically.com/en/mutilate. Accessed 5 Nov. 2026.

Last edited on . ·