Etymologically

Etymology and origin of the English word litotes

Confidence
Established
Formation
Borrowing
First attested
1589 More words from the 16th century
Borrowed from
Ancient Greek λιτότης
Ultimate origin
Ancient Greek λιτός

Pronunciation

  • UK: /laɪˈtəʊ.tiːz/[1]

Etymology

It is borrowed from Ancient Greek λιτότης (lītótēs, “plainness, simplicity”),[2][3][4][5][6][1] from λιτός (lītós, “smooth, plain, simple; small, meagre”).[2][3][4][7][8] The Shorter Oxford, the Oxford Dictionary of English, Hoad and Wiktionary bring it through Late Latin lītotēs,[9][10][7][1] and Dictionary.com through New Latin.[11] Etymonline adds that the Greek adjective, of style, meant simple and unadorned.[3] Barnhart and Merriam-Webster Unabridged relate it to Ancient Greek λεῖος (leîos, “smooth”),[4][6] and Barnhart and the American Heritage Dictionary trace it to Proto-Indo-European *lei-;[4][5] Etymonline gives the root as *(s)lei- (“slimy, sticky, slippery”), hence "smooth", the source of slime.[3] Merriam-Webster Unabridged and Barnhart also refer it to lime.[6][4]

Earliest recorded meaning

A figure of speech in which something is affirmed by denying its opposite: Merriam-Webster Unabridged dates it to 1589,[6] and the Shorter Oxford and the Oxford Dictionary of English to the late 16th century.[9][10] The OED's first quotation is from J. Smith's Mysterie of Rhetorique Unvail'd (1656),[2] and Barnhart dates the word to 1657.[4]

Semantic evolution

The term has stayed in rhetoric, where it names both the figure and an example of it.[2][6] Hoad and Weekley illustrate it with "a citizen of no mean city", from the Acts of the Apostles,[7][8] and Etymonline with "no laughing matter".[3] Collins, Chambers and the Shorter Oxford describe it more broadly as understatement for effect,[12][13][9] which the Shorter Oxford and Chambers also call meiosis;[9][13] Merriam-Webster Unabridged sets it against hyperbole.[6]

Timeline

  • 1589 – a figure of speech that affirms something by denying its opposite.[6] The OED's first quotation is from 1656,[2] and Barnhart dates the word to 1657.[4]

Meanings

Noun

  1. (rhetoric) Understatement in which something is affirmed by denying its opposite, as in "not a bad idea" for "a good idea".[6][12][2][13]
  2. An instance of this figure of speech.[6][2]

Usage notes

The plural is the same as the singular, litotes.[6][12]

References

  1. ^ a b c Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. ^ a b c d e Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
  5. ^ a b The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  7. ^ a b c Hoad, T. F., ed. (1986), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  8. ^ a b Weekley, Ernest (1921), An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, London: John Murray
  9. ^ a b c d Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  10. ^ a b Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
  11. ^ Dictionary.com Unabridged (2016), based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, New York: Random House
  12. ^ a b c Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins
  13. ^ a b c The Chambers Dictionary (2014), 13th ed., Edinburgh: Chambers

Related etymologies

Cite this entry

“Litotes.” Etymologically, 7 Nov. 2026, etymologically.com/en/litotes. Accessed 7 Nov. 2026.

Last edited on . ·