Etymologically
← History of ignarus

ignarus Latin · revision 8079

16 Oct 2026, 15:23 by bogdan “New Latin entry (sources: de Vaan, OLD, Lewis & Short, TLL...)”

Initial text

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+ {{infobox|confidence=established|formation=derivation|attested=Plautus|origins=la gnārus}}
+
+ ==Pronunciation==
+ * IPA (Classical): [ɪŋˈnaː.rʊs]^(Wiktionary)
+ * IPA (Ecclesiastical): [iɲˈɲaː.rus]^(Wiktionary)
+
+ ==Forms==
+ '''ignārus''' (feminine ignāra, neuter ignārum, comparative ignārior, superlative ignārissimus); first/second-declension adjective^(Wiktionary)
+
+ ==Etymology==
+ It is from [[in-]] “not” and [[gnārus]] “knowing”.^(OLD 2012)^(Wiktionary)
+
+ ==Earliest recorded meaning==
+ The OLD's earliest citation is from Plautus, of someone unacquainted with something.^(OLD 2012) Köbler dates Plautus c. 250–184 BC.^(Köbler 2010)
+
+ ==Semantic evolution==
+ It meant having no knowledge, unaware, as in Terence, and in Plautus having no experience, unacquainted.^(OLD 2012) In Sallust it was used passively, unknown, unfamiliar.^(OLD 2012)
+
+ In Ecclesiastical Latin it meant ignorant, inexperienced.^(Stelten 1995) British Medieval Latin used it of the unknowing and, with a genitive, of having no knowledge of something.^(DMLBS) It survives in Italian and Spanish ''ignaro'' and French ''ignare''.^(Wiktionary) Its derived verb [[ignōrō]] “not to know” gave [[en|ignorant]] through its participle.^(Etymonline)
+
+ ==Timeline==
+ * c. 250–184 BC – Plautus uses it of the inexperienced.^(OLD 2012)^(Köbler 2010)
+ * 190–159 BC – Terence uses it of the ignorant.^(OLD 2012)^(Köbler 2010)
+ * 86–34 BC – Sallust uses it in the sense “unknown”.^(OLD 2012)^(Köbler 2010)
+
+ ==Meanings==
+ ===Adjective===
+ # [[m|en|Ignorant]], unaware.^(OLD 2012)
+ # Inexperienced, unacquainted.^(OLD 2012)
+ # Unknown, unfamiliar.^(OLD 2012)
+
+ ==Word family==
+ * [[ignōrō]]
+ * [[perignārus]]
+
+ ==Related words==
+ * [[gnārus]]
+ * [[en|ignorant]]
+
+ ==References==
+ {{reflist}}