Etymologically
← History of identical

identical English · revision 6352

16 Oct 2026, 07:28 by bogdan “en10k b0274: veteran … detective” current version

Initial text

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+ {{infobox|confidence=established|formation=borrowing|attested=1581|origins=la idem}}
+
+ ==Pronunciation==
+ * IPA: /ɪˈdɛntɪkl̩/, /aɪˈdɛntɪkl̩/^(Wiktionary)
+
+ ==Etymology==
+ It is probably formed from [[la-med|identicus|t=the same]] and [[-al]],^(MWU 2024)^(Barnhart 1988)^(Etymonline) from [[m|la-lat|identitās|t=sameness]] (see [[identity]]), from [[m|la|idem|t=the same]].^(Etymonline)^(Barnhart 1988) It replaced Middle English idemptical (about 1475).^(Barnhart 1988)^(Etymonline)
+
+ ==Earliest recorded meaning==
+ In logic, expressing an identity: 1620 in Barnhart, the 1610s in Etymonline;^(Barnhart 1988)^(Etymonline) MWU dates the sense ''being the same'' from 1581, and SOED and NODE the late 16th century.^(MWU 2024)^(NODE 1998)
+
+ ==Semantic evolution==
+ Being the same or very similar in general is first recorded before 1633.^(Barnhart 1988)^(OED 1989)^(Etymonline) Agreeing exactly in all properties is from 1677.^(OED 1989) In geometry, of figures equal and similar, it is from 1806.^(OED 1989) ''Identical twins'', from a single fertilized egg, are from 1889.^(OED 1989)
+
+ ==Timeline==
+ * c. 1475 – idemptical.^(Barnhart 1988)
+ * 1620 – in logic.^(Barnhart 1988)
+ * before 1633 – the very same.^(Barnhart 1988)^(OED 1989)
+ * 1677 – exactly alike.^(OED 1989)
+ * 1889 – identical twins.^(OED 1989)
+
+ ==Modern meaning==
+ ===Adjective===
+ # Exactly alike or equal in every detail.^(AHD)^(Collins 2023)
+ # Being the very same: ''the identical room we stayed in''.^(AHD)^(Collins 2023)
+ # Of twins, developed from a single fertilized egg.^(AHD)^(Collins 2023)
+
+ ==Word family==
+ * [[identically]]
+ * [[identicalness]]
+ * [[unidentical]]
+ * [[self-identical]]
+ * [[nonidentical]]
+ * [[identical twin]]
+
+ ==Related words==
+ * [[identify]]
+ * [[identity]]
+ * [[idem]]
+
+ ==References==
+ {{reflist}}