Etymologically
← History of amongst

amongst English · revision 6077

16 Oct 2026, 04:50 by bogdan “en10k b0238: discrimination … amongst; favour 2381 skipped” current version

Initial text

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+ {{infobox|confidence=established|formation=derivation|attested=c. 1250}}
+
+ ==Pronunciation==
+ * IPA: /əˈmʌŋst/^(Roach et al. 2011)
+
+ ==Etymology==
+ It is Middle English amonges, from [[among]] with the adverbial genitive [[-s]] or -es.^(Barnhart 1988)^(Etymonline)^(MWU 2024)^(Hoad 1986) The final -t, unetymological, appeared in the 16th century, probably by association with superlatives in -st and -est, as in [[amidst]] and [[against]];^(Barnhart 1988)^(Etymonline)^(Hoad 1986) Barnhart also allows that it was added for ease of articulation, as in [[betwixt]].^(Barnhart 1988)
+
+ ==Earliest recorded meaning==
+ Amonges, in the senses of among: before 1250 in Barnhart, the mid-13th century in Etymonline, about 1250 in the OED.^(Barnhart 1988)^(Etymonline)^(OED 1989)
+
+ ==Semantic evolution==
+ The OED notes that amongst is less usual than among in the primary local sense, “in the midst of”.^(OED 1989) It shares all the senses of among.^(SOED 2002)^(OED 1989) The COED labels it chiefly British,^(COED 2004) and Collins, the LDOCE, MWU and Chambers give it as an alternative form of among.^(Collins 2023)^(LDOCE 2009)^(MWU 2024)^(Chambers 2008) In Oxfordshire dialect ''amongst the middlins'' meant not in very good health.^(Wright 1898)
+
+ ==Timeline==
+ * c. 1250 – amonges.^(OED 1989)^(Barnhart 1988)
+ * 16th century – the ending -st.^(Barnhart 1988)^(Etymonline)^(Hoad 1986)
+
+ ==Modern meaning==
+ ===Preposition===
+ # ''(chiefly Brit.)'' [[among|alt=Among]]: in the midst of, in the group of, or shared between.^(COED 2004)^(Collins 2023)
+
+ ==Related words==
+ * [[among]]
+ * [[amidst]]
+ * [[against]]
+ * [[betwixt]]
+ * [[whilst]]
+ * [[mingle]]
+
+ ==References==
+ {{reflist}}