Etymologically
← History of subsequent

subsequent English · revision 5538

16 Oct 2026, 02:53 by bogdan “en10k b0209: shell … subsequent” current version

Initial text

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+ {{infobox|confidence=established|formation=borrowing|attested=c. 1450|origins=la sequī}}
+
+ ==Pronunciation==
+ * IPA: UK /ˈsʌb.sɪ.kwənt/, /ˈsʌb.sə.kwənt/, US /ˈsʌb.sɪ.kwənt/^(Roach et al. 2011)
+
+ ==Etymology==
+ It is [[bor|frm|subséquent]] and directly [[bor|la|subsequēns|t=following closely]],^(Barnhart 1988)^(Etymonline)^(Hoad 1986) the present participle of [[m|la|subsequī|t=to follow closely, come after]],^(Etymonline)^(Barnhart 1988) from [[m|la|sub-|t=closely, up to]] and [[m|la|sequī|t=to follow]],^(Etymonline)^(Barnhart 1988) from [[ine-pro|*sekʷ-|t=to follow]].^(Etymonline) See [[sequel]].^(Barnhart 1988)
+
+ ==Earliest recorded meaning==
+ Coming after, following in order: about 1450 in Barnhart, before 1460 in the OED, the mid-15th century in Etymonline.^(Barnhart 1988)^(OED 1989)^(Etymonline)
+
+ ==Semantic evolution==
+ Following in time, later, is from 1503–04,^(OED 1989) and ''subsequent to'', after, from 1647.^(OED 1989) The Latin verb could also mean “to imitate, conform to”.^(Etymonline) In physical geography a subsequent stream is one that has formed its course along the softer rocks, from 1862.^(OED 1989) The noun, a person or thing that follows, is from 1603 and obsolete.^(OED 1989)
+
+ ==Timeline==
+ * c. 1450 – following in order.^(Barnhart 1988)
+ * 1503 – following in time.^(OED 1989)
+ * 1647 – ''subsequent to''.^(OED 1989)
+ * 1862 – in geography.^(OED 1989)
+
+ ==Modern meaning==
+ ===Adjective===
+ # Coming after something else in time or order; [[following]] or [[later]].^(AHD)^(Collins 2023)
+ # ''(subsequent to)'' After.^(OED 1989)^(SOED 2002)
+
+ ==Word family==
+ * [[subsequently]]
+ * [[subsequentness]]
+
+ ==Related words==
+ * [[sequel]]
+ * [[sequence]]
+ * [[consequent]]
+ * [[sue]]
+
+ ==References==
+ {{reflist}}