Etymologically
← History of contages

contages Latin · revision 36920

21 Oct 2026, 00:30 by bogdan “New Latin entry (la10k)” current version

Initial text

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+ {{infobox|confidence=established|formation=derivation|attested=96–55 BC, Lucretius|origins=ine-pro *th₂-n-g-}}
+
+ ==Forms==
+ '''contāgēs''' ''f'' (genitive contāgis); third declension^(OLD 2012)^(Lewis & Short 1879)
+ Lucretius has the ablative ''contāgē''.^(OLD 2012)
+ The grammarian Charisius notes that its genitive ends in ''-is''.^(TLL)
+
+ ==Etymology==
+ It is [[af|la|con-|tangō|-ēs|t2=to touch]], formed with the stem ⟨tag-⟩ of the verb.^(OLD 2012) The TLL compares [[m|la|contingō|t=to touch]] and [[contāgiō]].^(TLL) De Vaan traces [[m|la|tangō]] to [[itc-pro|*tang-e-]] and [[ine-pro|*th₂-n-g-|t=to touch]]; the long ⟨ā⟩ of this noun and of that one is disputed, and may continue a full grade [[m|ine-pro|*teh₂g-]] or copy other compounds such as [[m|la|compāgēs]].^(de Vaan 2008) Cognate with [[grc|τεταγών|tr=tetagṓn|t=having seized]].^(de Vaan 2008)
+
+ ==Earliest recorded meaning==
+ It is found first in Lucretius,^(Köbler 2010) meaning contact or touch.^(OLD 2012)^(Lewis & Short 1879)
+
+ ==Semantic evolution==
+ Lewis and Short call it a Lucretian word; he has it in the third and fourth books, and in the plural in the sixth.^(Lewis & Short 1879) Besides contact, the OLD gives it the sense of infection or contagion,^(OLD 2012) which Conte finds in the sixth book.^(Conte 2010) Arnobius, at the start of the 4th century, uses it again for contact.^(Georges 1913)
+
+ ==Timeline==
+ * 96–55 BC – Lucretius uses it of contact and contagion.^(OLD 2012)^(Köbler 2010)
+ * 297–310 AD – Arnobius uses it of contact.^(Georges 1913)^(Köbler 2010)
+
+ ==Meanings==
+ ===Noun===
+ # [[m|en|contact|alt=Contact]], touch.^(OLD 2012)^(Lewis & Short 1879)
+ # [[m|en|infection|alt=Infection]], [[m|en|contagion]].^(OLD 2012)^(Conte 2010)
+
+ ==Related words==
+ * [[contāgium]]
+ * [[contingō]]
+
+ ==References==
+ {{reflist}}