supervacuus Latin · revision 10070
17 Oct 2026, 01:38 by bogdan “New Latin entry (sources: de Vaan, OLD, Lewis & Short, TLL...)” current version
Initial text
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+ {{infobox|confidence=established|formation=compound|attested=Horace|origins=la super, la vacuus}}
+
+ ==Pronunciation==
+ * IPA (Classical): [sʊ.pɛrˈwa.ku.ʊs]^(Wiktionary)
+ * IPA (Ecclesiastical): [su.perˈvaː.ku.us]^(Wiktionary)
+
+ ==Forms==
+ '''supervacuus''' (feminine supervacua, neuter supervacuum); first/second-declension adjective^(Wiktionary)
+
+ ==Etymology==
+ It is from [[m|la|super-]] and [[vacuus]] “empty”, or from [[vacō]] “to be empty” with [[m|la|-uus]].^(OLD 2012)^(Wiktionary)^(Köbler 2010)
+
+ ==Earliest recorded meaning==
+ Köbler's earliest source is Horace, and the OLD's earliest citations include Vitruvius and Horace.^(Köbler 2010)^(OLD 2012) Köbler dates Horace 65–8 BC.^(Köbler 2010)
+
+ ==Semantic evolution==
+ It meant beyond what is needed, superfluous, redundant, as in Vitruvius, and serving no useful purpose, needless, as in Horace and Quintilian.^(OLD 2012)^(Gaffiot 2016) Lewis & Short note it is not found before Augustus, while [[supervacāneus]] is the classical word, and Varro censured its use.^(Lewis & Short 1879)^(OLD 2012)
+
+ Medieval Latin used it for worthless, contemptible.^(Niermeyer 1976) English ''supervacuous'' is from it.^(Wiktionary)
+
+ ==Timeline==
+ * c. 84–c. 25 BC – Vitruvius uses it.^(OLD 2012)^(Köbler 2010)
+ * 65–8 BC – Horace uses it.^(OLD 2012)^(Köbler 2010)
+ * c. 35–95/96 AD – Quintilian uses it.^(Gaffiot 2016)^(Köbler 2010)
+
+ ==Meanings==
+ ===Adjective===
+ # [[m|en|superfluous|alt=Superfluous]], [[m|en|redundant]].^(OLD 2012)^(Lewis & Short 1879)
+ # [[m|en|needless|alt=Needless]], useless.^(OLD 2012)^(Niermeyer 1976)
+
+ ==Related words==
+ * [[vacuus]]
+ * [[vacō]]
+ * [[supervacāneus]]
+
+ ==References==
+ {{reflist}}