mox
Pronunciation
Forms
mox (not comparable)[1]
Etymology
It is inherited from Proto-Italic *moks, inherited from Proto-Indo-European *moḱs (“soon”).[2][1][3] De Vaan leaves open whether the PIE word was a locative plural in ⟨*-su⟩ or a u-stem, and calls the root uncertain.[2]
Cognate with Old Irish mos- (“soon”), Middle Welsh moch (“soon”), Sanskrit मक्षू (makṣū́, “quickly”) and Avestan mošu (“soon”).[2][4][5]
Earliest recorded meaning
De Vaan dates it from Plautus;[2] in the prologue of the Menaechmi the speaker warns nē mox errētis, “so that you do not go wrong soon”.[4] Köbler cites it first from Ennius.[3]
Semantic evolution
Mox is “soon, presently”, of the near future;[4][6] quam mox? asks “how soon?”.[4][6] Of the past it means “a little later, afterwards”, and in lists “next”, in place or in rank.[4] The jurists use mox quam for “as soon as”.[4]
In Medieval Latin it means “at once”, and as a conjunction (mox ut or mox alone) “as soon as”.[7]
Timeline
- c. 250–184 BC – Plautus: nē mox errētis.[4][3]
- 190–159 BC – Terence: mox ego hūc revertor, “I'll be back here soon”.[6][3]
- 70–19 BC – Virgil uses it for “afterwards, next”.[4][3]
- 23/24–79 AD – Pliny the Elder uses it for the next item in a list.[4][3]
Meanings
Adverb
- soon, presently;[4][6][1][8] quam mox?, how soon?[4]
- Afterwards, later, then.[4][1]
- Next (in a series, in place or rank).[4]
- mox quam, mox ut, as soon as.[4][1]
- (Medieval Latin) At once, directly.[7]
References
- ^ a b c d e f g Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
- ^ a b c d de Vaan, Michiel (2008), Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages, Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 7, Leiden; Boston: Brill
- ^ a b c d e f Köbler, Gerhard (2010), Lateinisches Abkunfts- und Wirkungswörterbuch für Altertum und Mittelalter, online ed., koeblergerhard.de
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Glare, P. G. W., ed. (2012), Oxford Latin Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ Thesaurus linguae Latinae (1900–), Leipzig: Teubner; Berlin: De Gruyter; open-access ed., Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften
- ^ a b c d Lewis, Charlton T.; Short, Charles (1879), A Latin Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ a b Niermeyer, J. F. (1976), Mediae Latinitatis Lexicon Minus, Leiden: Brill
- ^ Stelten, Leo F. (1995), Dictionary of Ecclesiastical Latin, Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson