Etymologically
Log in

abusivus

This is the current revision of this entry, as edited by bogdan on 23 October 2026 at 10:53. This address is a permanent link to this version.
Changes in this edit History

Pronunciation

  • Classical: [a.buːˈsiː.wʊs][1]
  • Ecclesiastical: [a.buˈs̬iː.vus][1]

Forms

abūsīvus (feminine abūsīva, neuter abūsīvum); first/second-declension adjective[1]

Etymology

It is from Latin abūtor (“to use up; to misuse”) + -īvus, formed on the participle stem ⟨abūs-⟩ of the verb.[1][2][3]

Earliest recorded meaning

Its first author is an anonymous panegyric in the collection of Latin panegyrics: addressed to Constantine, it speaks of a name mutilated by a misapplied title.[2][4][5]

Semantic evolution

In the schools it became a technical word for a term used loosely or out of its proper sense, the opposite of proprius.[4] The grammarian Pompeius says that a certain comparison is not a true one but abūsīva;[4] Caelius Aurelianus, writing on medicine, wants to use proper words, not loose ones;[4] Augustine, in his unfinished work against Julian, speaks of words used abūsīvē and propriē;[4] and Boethius distinguishes definitions in the strict sense from those so called loosely.[4] The grammarian Consentius calls possessive nouns abūsīva as well.[4]

A treatise ascribed to Cyprian, On the Twelve Abuses of the World, uses the neuter as a noun for a perversion of the right order of things (a wise man without works, an old man without religion).[4] Medieval Latin used it of what constitutes an abuse.[6] English abusive, first “improper”, came from it through French.[3]

Timeline

  • 3rd–4th century AD – An anonymous panegyric to Constantine uses it of a misapplied title.[2][4][5]
  • 354–430 AD – Augustine opposes words used loosely to words used properly.[4][5]
  • 5th century AD – Caelius Aurelianus uses it of loosely used medical terms.[4][5]
  • 1530s – English abusive is borrowed, through French.[3]

Meanings

Adjective

  1. (Late Latin) Misapplied, used improperly.[2][4][1]
  2. (grammar, rhetoric) Used loosely, not in the proper or literal sense; catachrestic.[4]
  3. (Medieval Latin) Constituting an abuse, misused.[6]

Noun

  1. (Late Latin, neuter) An abuse, a thing contrary to right order.[4]

Usage notes

The adverb abūsīvē is older: Quintilian says that poets use neighbouring words abūsīvē even for things that have names of their own, and the jurist Ulpian opposes it to propriē.[4] It goes with the noun abūsiō, which Quintilian discusses among the figures of speech.[4]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d Lewis, Charlton T.; Short, Charles (1879), A Latin Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  3. ^ a b c Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Thesaurus linguae Latinae (1900–), Leipzig: Teubner; Berlin: De Gruyter; open-access ed., Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften
  5. ^ a b c d Köbler, Gerhard (2010), Lateinisches Abkunfts- und Wirkungswörterbuch für Altertum und Mittelalter, online ed., koeblergerhard.de
  6. ^ a b Niermeyer, J. F. (1976), Mediae Latinitatis Lexicon Minus, Leiden: Brill