Etymologically

unequal

This is the current revision of this entry, as edited by bogdan on 31 October 2026 at 23:45. This address is a permanent link to this version.

Pronunciation

  • /ʌnˈiːkwəl/[1]

Etymology

It is formed from English un- + equal, with the negative prefix.[2][3][4][5] Equal is from Latin aequālis (“uniform, identical, equal”), from aequus (“level, even; just, fair”), which is of unknown origin.[3] The older form inequal, from the Latin inaequālis, was used in the sense "not the same in amount" from the late 14th century.[3][2]

Earliest recorded meaning

Uneven, having an undulating surface: probably before 1425, in a translation of Guy de Chauliac's Grande Chirurgie.[2] Etymonline dates this sense, in the form unequale, to the early 15th century,[3] while the Shorter Oxford and Dictionary.com date the word to the 16th century.[4][5]

Semantic evolution

In the 16th century the word gained most of its modern range: irregular or variable in extent (1556) and in movement (1561), inconsistent in character or quality (1590), and differing in amount or size (1565), now the main sense.[2] Of a match or relationship between people of different standing or strength it is recorded from 1552, and of a contest in which one side has the advantage from 1636.[2][3] From 1529 to the mid 18th century it also meant unfair or unjust, of actions and then of people.[2][4] Trench noted that early writers used it constantly for "unjust", a sense the Latin inaequālis never had, as if influenced by inīquus (“unjust”), and quoted Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra and Ben Jonson's Volpone.[6] Johnson (1755) still gave "not even" as the first sense.[7] In Scots the sense "unfair" survived into the 18th century.[8] The sense "not adequate (to a task)", with to, is recorded from 1548,[2] and Etymonline dates it to the 1690s.[3]

Timeline

  • before 1425 – uneven, not smooth (of a surface).[2][3]
  • 1529 – unfair, inequitable (obsolete by 1761).[2]
  • 1548 – not adequate for a task, with to.[2]
  • 1552 – of a pairing of people, differing in rank, wealth or strength.[2]
  • 1556 – irregular or variable in extent or duration.[2]
  • 1565 – differing in amount, size or quality.[2][9]
  • 1600 – noun, a person or thing not equal to another.[9]
  • 1636 – of a contest, unfairly matched.[2]

Meanings

Adjective

  1. Not the same in quantity, size, value or rank: two ropes of unequal length.[10][9][2]
  2. Not fairly balanced; giving one side an advantage: an unequal contest.[10][9][2]
  3. Not able to cope with something; inadequate (followed by to): He proved unequal to the job.[10][2][4]
  4. Varying or inconsistent in character or quality; irregular.[10][2][4]
  5. (obsolete) Unjust, unfair.[10][2][4]

Noun

  1. A person or thing that is not equal to another, usually in the plural: a society of unequals.[9]

Word family

  • unequally
  • unequalness

References

  1. ^ Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  4. ^ a b c d e f Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  5. ^ a b Dictionary.com Unabridged (2016), based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, New York: Random House
  6. ^ Trench, Richard Chenevix (1859), A Select Glossary of English Words Used Formerly in Senses Different from Their Present, London: John W. Parker
  7. ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
  8. ^ Wright, Joseph, ed. (1898–1905), The English Dialect Dictionary, 6 vols., Oxford: Henry Frowde; via EDD Online 4.0, University of Innsbruck (CC BY 4.0)
  9. ^ a b c d e Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  10. ^ a b c d e Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins