remark
Pronunciation
Etymology
It is borrowed from Middle French remarquer (“to observe, take notice of”),[2][3][4][5] recorded in French from 1549, in the sense "to single out a person" from 1585, and in the sense "to make a remark" from before 1662.[2] The French verb is formed from re-, here probably an intensive prefix, and marquer (“to mark, note”),[2][6][7][8] which probably comes from a Germanic source: Barnhart and Etymonline compare Old High German marchōn (“to delimit”),[8][6] and the AHD traces it ultimately to Old Norse merki (“mark, sign”);[9] it is thus related to mark.[6][10][11] Hoad says that the French verb replaced Old French remerquier and was probably modelled on Italian rimarcare,[12] but the OED dates the Italian verb only from 1630 and takes it from French.[2] Barnhart treats the English verb as in most instances re-formed from re- and the verb mark on the French model.[8] The noun, from 1614, is taken by the OED as formed from the English verb, though it compares French remarque;[2] the Shorter Oxford, Dictionary.com and Klein derive it from that French noun, which was formed from remarquer.[4][5][13]
Earliest recorded meaning
To observe, take notice of, perceive: 1581, in N. Burne's Disputation.[2] Merriam-Webster also dates the verb to 1581, and the Shorter Oxford to the late 16th century,[3][4] while Etymonline and Barnhart date it to the 1630s, in the now obsolete sense "to mark out, distinguish".[6][8]
Semantic evolution
The early verb could mean to point out or indicate (1592–1787) and to mark out or distinguish (1633–71, in Ford's ’Tis Pitty Shee’s a Whore);[2][8] Trench (1859) noted that to remark had once meant to point out or designate, and that only verbal remarks were left.[14] The sense of saying or writing something as a comment followed in 1666, and the intransitive remark on in 1676.[2] Weekley explains the commenting sense as growing out of that of calling attention to particular points, and Ayto as coming from the notion of making a verbal observation.[10][11] The noun went the same way: observation or notice (1614), a spoken or written comment (1629), and of great remark, worthy of notice (before 1618, now literary), while its senses "a mark or sign of a quality" (1624–1864) and "an act of observing" (1628–1855) died out.[2] Johnson (1755) defined the noun as "observation; note; notice taken".[15] In Shetland dialect in remark meant remarkable or exceptional.[16]
Timeline
- 1581 – to observe, take notice of.[2][3]
- 1592 – to point out; to comment on (obsolete by 1787).[2]
- 1614 – noun, observation, notice.[2]
- before 1618 – of great remark, worthy of notice.[2]
- 1624 – noun, a mark or sign of a quality (obsolete by 1864).[2]
- 1629 – noun, a spoken or written comment.[2]
- 1633 – to mark out, distinguish (obsolete by 1671).[2][8]
- 1666 – to say or write as a comment.[2]
- 1676 – intransitive, to remark on something.[2]
- 1755 – Johnson defines the noun as observation or notice.[15]
Meanings
Verb
- To say something as a casual comment; to mention in passing: He remarked that the room was cold.[17][2][3]
- To make a comment on or upon something: Few guests remarked on the new curtains.[17][2]
- To notice or perceive; to observe.[17][2][3]
- (obsolete) To point out; to mark out or distinguish.[2][3][4]
Noun
- A brief spoken or written comment; a passing expression of opinion: a rude remark.[17][2][3]
- Notice or comment: The change went by without remark.[17][2][3]
- of remark: worthy of notice (literary).[2]
Word family
- remarker
- remarkable
Related words
- mark
- marque
- remarque
Usage notes
Dictionary.com distinguishes remark, a casual passing expression of opinion, from comment, which explains or judges a particular point, note, a written memorandum or explanation, and observation, a comment based on judgment and experience.[5] In engraving, remark is also a spelling of remarque, altered after mark and recorded from 1859, usually in remark proof.[2][17]
References
- ^ a b Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d e f g h Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
- ^ a b c d Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c Dictionary.com Unabridged (2016), based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, New York: Random House
- ^ a b c d Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
- ^ Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d e f Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
- ^ The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
- ^ a b Weekley, Ernest (1921), An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, London: John Murray
- ^ a b Ayto, John (2005), Word Origins: The Secret Histories of English Words from A to Z, 2nd ed., London: A & C Black
- ^ Hoad, T. F., ed. (1986), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford: Clarendon Press
- ^ Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
- ^ Trench, Richard Chenevix (1859), A Select Glossary of English Words Used Formerly in Senses Different from Their Present, London: John W. Parker
- ^ a b Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.
- ^ Wright, Joseph, ed. (1898–1905), The English Dialect Dictionary, 6 vols., Oxford: Henry Frowde; via EDD Online 4.0, University of Innsbruck (CC BY 4.0)
- ^ a b c d e f Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins