Etymologically

intellect

This is the current revision of this entry, as edited by bogdan on 31 October 2026 at 11:17. This address is a permanent link to this version.

Pronunciation

  • UK: /ˈɪntəlɛkt/[1]
  • US: /ˈɪntəˌlɛkt/[1]

Etymology

It is inherited from Middle English intellect,[2][3] borrowed from Old French intellect (“intellectual capacity”), also intellecte,[4][3][5] and directly borrowed from Latin intellēctus (“perception, discernment, understanding”).[4][5][6] The OED, revised in 2010, takes it only as a borrowing of the Latin noun and notes that the French word, recorded from about 1265, was rare before the 16th century.[7] The Latin noun is the past participle of intellegō (“to perceive, understand”), used as a noun,[4][8][6][7] and the verb is formed from inter- (“between”) and legō (“to gather, choose, read”),[8][9][10] so that it literally meant "to choose between".[11][8] The Latin word was used to translate the Greek word for mind in Aristotle.[4] intelligent, intelligence and intelligible come from the same verb,[8][11] and lecture and legible from its base.[8]

Earliest recorded meaning

Understanding, the power of reasoning: about 1380, in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales,[5] but the OED's first quotation is from Trevisa's translation of Bartholomaeus Anglicus, before 1398.[7]

Semantic evolution

Etymonline notes that the word was little used before the 16th century.[4] Two early senses, "meaning, sense" (before 1460 to 1598) and "comprehension" (about 1475 to 1543), died out.[7] From 1602 the word was used of intellect embodied: first a being or spirit with understanding, now obsolete, then a person of great intelligence, or such people collectively.[7][12] The plural intellects, mental powers or wits, appears in 1649 and is now archaic.[7] Johnson (1755) defined it as the intelligent mind, the power of understanding.[13] A verb intellect, to understand by the intellect, is recorded from 1599 and was apparently formed again in the 20th century; it is now chiefly philosophical.[7]

Timeline

  • c. 1380 – understanding, in Chaucer.[5]
  • before 1398 – the faculty of knowing and reasoning.[7]
  • before 1460 – meaning, sense (obsolete by 1598).[7]
  • 1599 – verb, to understand by means of the intellect.[7]
  • 1602 – a being with understanding; later a person of great intelligence.[7]
  • 1649 – plural, mental powers, wits (now archaic).[7]

Meanings

Noun

  1. The power of the mind to reason, think and understand, as distinct from feeling and will: His quick intellect made him a feared opponent in debate.[12][2][7]
  2. A person with a powerful mind, or such people collectively: one of the finest intellects of her generation.[12][7]

References

  1. ^ a b Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  3. ^ a b The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  4. ^ a b c d e Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  5. ^ a b c d Barnhart, Robert K. (1988), The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology
  6. ^ a b Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  8. ^ a b c d e Ayto, John (2005), Word Origins: The Secret Histories of English Words from A to Z, 2nd ed., London: A & C Black
  9. ^ Skeat, Walter W. (1911), A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, new ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press
  10. ^ Weekley, Ernest (1921), An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, London: John Murray
  11. ^ a b Cresswell, Julia (2021), Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
  12. ^ a b c Collins English Dictionary (2023), Glasgow: HarperCollins
  13. ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.