Etymologically

induction

This is the current revision of this entry, as edited by bogdan on 24 October 2026 at 18:41. This address is a permanent link to this version.

Pronunciation

  • /ɪnˈdʌkʃən/[1]

Etymology

It is inherited from Middle English induccioun,[2][3][4] borrowed from Old French induction, recorded in French from the 14th century,[2][5] or directly borrowed from Latin inductiō (“a leading in, introduction, admission”),[5][2][6][7] a noun of action from inductus, the past participle of indūcō (“to lead in; to induce”),[2][8][3] the source of induce and induct.[2][7] The Latin verb is formed from in- (“in, into”) and dūcō (“to lead”),[9][2] which Etymonline and the American Heritage Dictionary trace to Proto-Indo-European *deuk- (“to lead”).[2][9] As a term of logic, the Latin noun translated Ancient Greek ἐπαγωγή (epagōgḗ, “a bringing on or in”), from ἐπάγειν (epágein, “to bring on or in”), in Cicero's rendering of Aristotle.[8][2] In Anglo-Norman the noun is recorded from about 1292, for admission to property and the formal admission of a clergyman.[10]

Earliest recorded meaning

The formal installing of a clergyman in possession of a church and its revenues: about 1380, in a work of Wyclif's;[5][11] the Middle English Dictionary records the word with this sense and for putting someone in possession of an inheritance.[4] Etymonline gives a late 14th-century sense "advancement toward the grace of God", and the Middle English Dictionary likewise lists the stages through which a lower angel passes towards the grace of God.[2][4]

Semantic evolution

The idea of "leading in" spread from the church to any formal installing in an office or possession (before 1464),[5][11] and in 1934 to enlistment into military service in the United States.[5][2] The logical sense, reasoning from particular instances to a general rule, is in Middle English from the early 15th century;[2][4][11] Etymonline contrasts it with deduction, which runs from the general principle to the individual fact.[2] From it grew the citing of many separate facts to prove a general statement (1551)[5][11] and, in the 19th century, mathematical induction, the proof of a theorem by showing that it holds for each next case of a series.[7][11] Other 16th-century senses, inducement by persuasion (1490–1588), an initiation into knowledge (1526) and an introduction or preface to a book (1533), are now obsolete, rare or archaic;[5][11] Johnson (1755) gave "introduction; entrance" first, quoting Shakespeare.[12] The physical sense, the producing of an electric or magnetic state in a body by the nearness of another, without contact, dates from 1801,[2][11] and the bringing on of a process, especially of labour in childbirth, from the 19th century.[11]

Timeline

  • c. 1380 – the formal installing of a clergyman in a church and its revenues.[5][11]
  • early 15th century – in logic, reasoning from particular cases to a general conclusion.[2][4]
  • before 1464 – a formal installing in any office or possession.[5]
  • 1490 – inducement by persuasion (obsolete by 1588).[5][11]
  • 1533 – an introduction or preface to a book (now archaic).[5]
  • 1551 – the adducing of separate facts to prove a general statement.[5][11]
  • 1801 – electric or magnetic induction.[2][11]
  • 1838 – in mathematics, proof by induction.[11]
  • 1871 – in Presbyterian churches, the placing of an ordained minister in a new charge.[5][11]
  • 1934 – induction into military service, in the United States.[5][2]

Modern meaning

Noun

  1. The formal installation of a person in an office, a position or a church living, or the ceremony that marks it: her induction into the hall of fame.
  2. (US) Enlistment into military service.
  3. (logic) Reasoning from particular observed cases to a general conclusion or law; a conclusion reached in this way; compare deduction.
  4. (mathematics) A method of proof that shows a theorem true for a first case and true for each next case whenever it is true for the one before.
  5. (physics) The producing of electricity or magnetism in a body by the nearness of a charged, magnetized or current-carrying body, without contact.
  6. The bringing on of a process, especially the artificial starting of labour in childbirth.
  7. In an internal-combustion engine, the drawing of the fuel and air mixture into the cylinder.

Word family

  • inductionless
  • self-induction
  • preinduction
  • reinduction
  • electromagnetic induction
  • mutual induction
  • induction coil
  • induction furnace

References

  1. ^ Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  3. ^ a b Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  4. ^ a b c d e Kurath, Hans; Kuhn, Sherman M.; Lewis, Robert E., eds. (1952–2001), Middle English Dictionary, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; online edition ed. Frances McSparran et al. (2000–2018)
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Oxford English Dictionary Online (accessed March 2026), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  6. ^ Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press
  7. ^ a b c Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2002), 5th ed., ed. William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  8. ^ a b Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1966–1967.
  9. ^ a b The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (online 2024), 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  10. ^ Anglo-Norman Dictionary (AND2), Aberystwyth University, anglo-norman.net (2nd ed., 2005–)
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Kay, Christian; Roberts, Jane; Samuels, Michael; Wotherspoon, Irené, eds. (2009), Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford University Press; online edition (2024)
  12. ^ Johnson, Samuel (1755), A Dictionary of the English Language, London; 4th ed. 1773; Johnson's Dictionary Online, ed. Beth Rapp Young et al.