flummox
This is the current revision of this entry, as edited by bogdan on 15 October 2026 at 02:01. This address is a permanent link to this version.
Pronunciation
- IPA: /ˈflʌməks/[1]
Etymology
The origin is uncertain.[2][3][4] It is probably from an English dialect;[5][2] the OED finds candidate words in Herefordshire, Gloucestershire, Cheshire and Sheffield,[2] and calls the formation onomatopoeic, suggesting throwing something down roughly.[2]
Earliest recorded meaning
To bring to confusion; to confound or bewilder (1834 in Etymonline; 1837 in the OED and Merriam-Webster).[2][6][3]
Semantic evolution
It was a slang or cant word in English and Australian use,[2] earlier meaning to beat someone so as to bewilder them (1832, in trial testimony).[2] In American colloquial use (1839) it also meant to give up or collapse.[6][1] The general sense of perplexing someone is now the usual one.[5][3]
Timeline
- 1832 – to beat so as to bewilder.[2]
- 1834 – to perplex, bewilder.[2]
- 1837 – to confound, nonplus.[6][3]
- 1839 – US, to give up, collapse.[6]
Modern meaning
Verb
- To confuse or perplex; to bewilder.
- To give up or collapse.
Related words
- flabbergast
- bamboozle
- confound
References
- ^ a b Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
- ^ a b c d Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (2003), 11th ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
- ^ Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary (1999), 2nd ed., New York: Random House
- ^ a b The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (1992), 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin
- ^ a b c d Simpson, J. A.; Weiner, E. S. C., eds. (1989), The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press