Etymologically

correspondence

This is the current revision of this entry, as edited by bogdan on 17 October 2026 at 16:35. This address is a permanent link to this version.

Pronunciation

  • IPA: /ˌkɒɹ.ɪˈspɒn.dəns/, /ˌkɒɹ.əˈspɒn.dəns/ (UK); /ˌkoɹ.ɪˈspɑn.dəns/, /ˌkoɹ.əˈspɑn.dəns/ (US)[1]

Etymology

It is inherited from Middle English correspondence, borrowed from Middle French correspondance or directly Medieval Latin correspondentia,[2][3][4] from correspondēns, the present participle of correspondeō (“to correspond, harmonize”),[2] from com- (“together”) and respondeō (“to answer”) (see respond).[2]

Earliest recorded meaning

Agreement, congruence, harmony: 1413 in the OED, the early 15th century in Etymonline.[5][2]

Semantic evolution

Similarity or analogy is from 1605,[5] and relations between persons or communities from 1599.[5] Communication by letters is first attested in the 1640s,[2] and the letters themselves from 1771.[2] Swedenborg's doctrine of correspondences, that every natural thing corresponds to a spiritual one, is named from 1860.[5] In mathematics a correspondence is a relation between two sets, from 1866.[5]

Timeline

  • 1413 – agreement.[5]
  • 1599 – relations between persons.[5]
  • 1640s – communication by letter.[2]
  • 1771 – the letters exchanged.[2]
  • 1866 – correspondence in mathematics.[5]

Modern meaning

Noun

  1. Communication by exchanging letters, or the letters themselves.
  2. Agreement, similarity or close connection between things.

Adjective

  1. Relating to teaching by post: a correspondence course.

Word family

  • noncorrespondence
  • correspondence course
  • correspondence principle

References

  1. ^ Wiktionary, the free dictionary, https://en.wiktionary.org
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Harper, Douglas. Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com
  3. ^ Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (2024), online ed., Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster
  4. ^ Pearsall, Judy, ed. (1998), The New Oxford Dictionary of English, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Simpson, J. A.; Weiner, E. S. C., eds. (1989), The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press